Thursday, March 22, 2007

Nobody's (s)miling


Oh alright then. Commenters have asked us why we haven't gleefully posted on the flop that was the Mayoral Mile. As we said in response, mainly because it'd be like posting about the weather - stating the obvious.

That anything established by Mickey for Mickey is inevitably set to fail, either spectacularly or - as in this case - by slowly withering. For instance: Mainstreet Mayoral office any closer to opening, Mickey?

But the Watchers have been bombarding our inbox with little gems such as the fact that woeful Winc had to race down to the riverside market on Saturday morning and make an offer he couldn't refuse to the mobile coffee guy who's always there to get him to up stakes and move to Cooks for the Mayoral Mile.

Then you have the Chron saying there were about 1,000 there for Saturday night's premiere races. True perhaps, but Watchers tell us that by around lunchtime it seemed pretty deserted. Take away the Collegiate kids ("ringies") who are pressganged into competing, plus their doting parents, aunts, uncles etc and, in the estimate of at least one Watcher, "you'd be left with bugger all real attendees".

Obviously the Chron's sports editor David Ogilvie didn't get the Maslin and MacNicol memo regarding sycophancy toward all things Mickey, because he commented:

Something has to be done, though, about the general running of the night - was it a case of too many irons in the fire? The athletics people were becoming frutstrated by the other hoo-haa and they couldn't get things down that they wanted.

There's some mediation to be done, a proper power base to be established for the running of future meetings.
And he asks how, with minor sponsor Mickey supposedly standing down, future events will be funded. Simple, says, Mickey: "We’ve put it in the annual plan for next year".

So an event which was only ever established to promote Michael Laws (otherwise, as a commenter asked, why isn't it called the Wanganui Mile?) is to be left high and dry by it's progenitor and the full cost of running future events dumped on ratepayers.

Rob Vinsen's summation of the whole disaster, posted to LawsWatch a few days ago, is worth highlighting:

...the Mayor got the Council to underwrite the event for $64,800. He put in $10,000, they hoped to get another $10,000 from ticket sales etc leaving the ratepayer funding the rest providing everything went to budget (unlike the Boxing Day Concert).

Now, I attend most athletics and cycling meetings and the plain truth is that if the competitors don't have their mums and dads watching there wouldn't be a crowd. The Mayoral Mile is not a formula for mass participation - unlike say the Round Lake Taupo Challenge which attracts 16,000 starters and as many again supporting.

Why? Because Taupo is a) a challenging event, and b) it is also a relay, attracting teams of starters. Why would anybody travel to Wanganui to jog 4 times around Cooks Gardens? Quite frankly if any promotor went to the Council with a plan to run an athletics type meet and asked for $64,800 backing they would be laughed out the door.

No economic case could be presented that would support ratepayers funds going into such an event - unlike the Masters Games for whom the Council comes up with only $40,000 each two years. I don't see that the Mayoral Mile has a future if Michael Laws is not there railroading his Vision councillors into voting for it.
Coming on the back of the Bikes disaster, the Boxing Day Concert disaster, the $60,000 wasted on containers for the Masters Games thanks to Mickey's mad Splash Centre scheme and who knows what else that hasn't come to light yet, Mickey couldn't be trusted to organise the tea trolley at a CWI meeting, let alone the proverbial fesitivities in a brewery.

Comments on this post are now closed.

64 comments:

Anonymous said...

Sad but true Lawswatch, sad but true.

Another mayoral trainwreck. I see Vision are having to advertise for candidates.

No decision on their mayoral candidate the Yellow Press announces breathlessly.

Is this a vain attempt to spark some sort of controversy? John Martin for Mayor. An end to this duplicitous fiasco.

Anonymous said...

As is usual laws watch - you miss the point about anything positive. On the same criteria you use every arts function in the city should be cancelled. You BUILD events (and you wouldn't know that because you have never done anything positive in your life).

The mayor put up $30K of his own money and that is $30k more than any loser in here.

As for the athletics wankers: if it wasn't for the mayor none of those top runners would have been here. Nick willis, Craig Mottram, 6 under 4-minute miles in the past 2 years - and Nick willis saying publicly that this is the best event in NZ. Miss that, did you?

By the way, did you hear the mayor is in Dancing with the Stars too?

Anonymous said...

Rob Vinsen is an authority?

A man who stood 4 times for council, kept losing, finally got elected, and was then arse-holed off the next time? So stood for Horizons regional council and lost again?

Yes, that is an authoritative opinion. Not.

Anonymous said...

I know this is off topic but does anyone else think the wording and instructions on the referendum are confusing?

Laws Watch said...

You BUILD events (and you wouldn't know that because you have never done anything positive in your life).

Just as you FLOG a dead horse that's so smelly people choose to bypass it in droves? (and you wouldn't know that because you've never had an original* thought in your life).

* One not prompted by Mickey.

Anonymous said...

Laws watch: you ARE a moron.

I'd always given you the benefit of the doubt but the earlier poster is right. events designed for mass participation are not designed to make money.

The Sarjeant Gallery chews through $750,000 of ratepayer money a year and the Museum over a $1 million. They probably cost more dosh per person entertained than the mayoral mile or the Cooks Concert.

Anonymous said...

No one cares what events cost so long as rates are low. Rates are low in wanganui thanks to this council.

Anonymous said...

wording and instructions on the referendum are confusing...
___________________________________

Or in the claims made about yearly savings for water softening, downright false.

Anonymous said...

..Newsflash team, anything Michael does or is connected with you oppose ...so you risk becoming the boy or girl who cries wolf.

The Lake Taupo Cycle Challenge began in 1977 with around 30 entrants. The very first New Zealand Masters Games event was held in Wanganui in 1989 with a fraction of the entries it boasts today. Event building takes time. This years Mile featured some great athletes and celebs and generated profile...for our great city and the Mayor and Energy Direct....so what.

The Mayoral is manipulative and a prick sometimes (and he'd most likely admit this), get over it, dont let this cloud your judgment. He has put his own cash into alot of causes and devoted his time, theres a heart there somewhere....your prescription = take the blinkers off, walk in grass with bare feet once a day, have a comfy shag with the lights on (with a semi reasonable partner) and it may open that soul. Peace.

Anonymous said...

Or in the claims made about yearly savings for water softening, downright false.

8:50 PM, March 22, 2007

*********************************

PROOF???

Anonymous said...

I hope you pricks aren't voting in the referendum. Y

You are opposed to anything this council does, so abstain.

Let the real people of Wanganui have their say instead.

Do a Mitchell-Anyon: bonfire your voting papers like Wanganui voters incinerated M-A's political career last election.

Anonymous said...

Anonymous said...

No one cares what events cost so long as rates are low. Rates are low in wanganui thanks to this council.

8:43 PM, March 22, 2007
_____________________________________

Well I do care. After mad mickey is no longer mayor, when the new council start adding up what mickey has cost this city, then wait and see if we don't have a rate rise.
I feel sorry for the incoming council and the new mayor whoever that may be. Mickey has over-spent
and the next lot will have an impossible task financially ahead of them.
Money spent must be recovered and guess what!! it can only come from the ratepayers this = rates increases.

By the time this happens Mickey has flown the coop.

Anonymous said...

"Take away the spectators... and the numbers wouldn't be great" - what sort of a statement is that? Anon is right, what have you ever done for Wanganui. The only thing they did wrong with the MMile was have WINC organise it. Apparently there were too many people involved in the organising and no one person actually taking responsibility. 'Winging it'. Surprising it went as well as it did. Athletics shouldn't complain the public loved it. Don't turn away the community Athletics.

Anonymous said...

John Martin for Mayor? I hope not. A protestor for Mayor? What a terrible thought. Wanganui, we can do better than that.

Anonymous said...

No one cares what events cost so long as rates are low. Rates are low in wanganui thanks to this council.

8:43 PM, March 22, 2007
---------------------------------

Hit the nail right on the head. We love what ML has done for our rates. If we do away with the Mayoral Mile and other events, then close the Gallery and Museum as well. Lets get really negative you losers.

Anonymous said...

PROOF?

squeals anonymickey.

read the referendumb paper, stupid. It's there in black and white that no figures have been guessed at for the costs of replacing steel pipes, so the "savings" figure (which is grossly exaggerated) is pure lies. I don't know anyone who's had to replace their water cylinder recently, and to claim that there'll be $230 worth of savings from using less washing up liquid is through the looking glass.

The whole thing is yet another excersize in lying and lying and lying, from who else but Lying Laws?

"A S.I.N.E.R."

Wouldn't that be better spelt asinine?

Anonymous said...

Anonymous said...
Or in the claims made about yearly savings for water softening, downright false.

8:50 PM, March 22, 2007

*********************************

PROOF???

10:06 PM, March 22, 2007




=================================

Yes i would like to see some proof too. A troll visiting this blog usually leaves such droppings but never offers any evidence to back his/her claims.

I will go with the independent MWH report commissioned by the council and publicly available on the referendum website.

Anonymous said...

Rob Vinsen is a credible commentator. Is that an oxymoron?

Anonymous said...

As one whose family competed in the event, I think the Mayoral Mile is a great idea for family enjoyment and a real incentive to get fit.

Anonymous said...

While it’s sad to think journalists’ jobs will be lost from Wanganui to the new outsourcing contract deal by the Chronic’s parent, it can’t hurt to have Mas’s crap checked and questioned by someone out of town who’s not read the memo telling everyone at the Chron to unquestioningly print every word Mickey says (as Lawswatch has pointed out).

Perhaps Mas can just stick to doing the weekend roundup now, you’d have to say he does it pretty well!

Anonymous said...

Let the real people of Wanganui have their say instead.
___________________________________

If they include you does that mean that the new definition of "real" is "ignorant and racist"? Or is it the minority who voted for your corrupt "mayor"? Or the 26 people who listen to him on the radio?

Anonymous said...

events designed for mass participation are not designed to make money.
__________________________________

So the Mile event fails one of the five core tests of Council decision making: it's uneconomic.

So there has to be a pressing concern from the community that it go ahead with any Council funding.

Laws started it, and he should fund it himself whether he's mayor or not. If he's so good at it, as he claims ad nauseam, finding sponsors to fund whatever he can't afford should be easy.

So how about it Mickey?

Anonymous said...

Anon said
Rob Vinsen is an authority?
A man who stood 4 times for council, kept losing, finally got elected, and was then arse-holed off the next time? So stood for Horizons regional council and lost again?

Normally I would not respond to imbeciles - however to put the record straight, I stood for John Blaikies NEW TEAM in the mid 80's along with Dot McKinnon for the ST Johns Hill Ward. Gerald McDouall won comfortably - in fact the NEW TEAM was such a disaster that when the VISION team approach was mooted ( and I was asked to be a candidate) I was highly skeptical of the merits of a team approach. As it turned out I was wrong on that point. I then stood in 1999 and was elected . In 2001 Ross Mitchel- Anyon pipped me by 40 votes after gaining a lot of publicity over the UCOL takeover. In the last election after refusing Michael Laws two telephoned approaches to me I ran for the Regional Council. The Vision momentum ( and advertising) was enough for Leonie Brookhammer to pip me by about 5300 to 5600. Bob Walker trailed well behind .
I wonder how many votes Leonie would have got if voters knew what her subsequent attendance record at Horizon's meetings was going to be.
Challenges are regularly made on this blog to put ones name forward at election time. Marty Lyndsay, Rangi Wills ,and Dot McKinnon have all tried and not been elected before, so I have every reason to simply ignore the idiot who is too gutless to put his/her name to his/her vindictive comment.

Laws Watch said...

If we do away with the Mayoral Mile and other events, then close the Gallery and Museum as well. Lets get really negative you losers.

Let's hope you don't run a business, anon.

If you're knee deep in debt and the previous owners had invested in expensive-to-operate infrastructure which couldn't simply be shut down, your solution to the cashflow crisis would be to waste more cash on something hardly anyone wants to buy.

Anonymous said...

Anonymous said...
Rob Vinsen is a credible commentator. Is that an oxymoron?

7:47 AM, March 23, 2007
+++++++

Michael Laws is a credible commentator. Is that an oxymoron?

YES - because he has only one goal in everything he says and does, ie to promote the whole idea of Michael Laws. His "opinions" simply aren't worth the paper they're written on or the airwaves they pollute. He's a dishonest, disingenous self-promoter. He is NOT credible.


Michael Laws is a credible Mayor. Is that an oxymoron?

YES

See above ... and add the fact that he was forced to resign after his last fame-grab in government ended with him knee deep in his own lies and deceptions.

Anonymous said...

Has anyone else noticed the pattern of Mickey’s relationships with others, ie he woos them (see Rob Vinsen’s comment above) then when they see through him, he abuses them. Some other names that spring to mind: Joan Street, Helen Lawrence and LawsWatch. Yes, that’s right. After Mickey giving this blog a rave review when it was launched he now spends all his spare time posting abusive comments. Wait till he starts on Higgie, Dottie et al … it will be hard to have an ounce of sympathy for any of them.

Anonymous said...

How credible is Mickey Mayor?

How shallow is the ocean?
How cold is the sun?

Anonymous said...

Rob Vinsen owns his comments whether they be on Lawswatch or in the Chron or anywhere else for that matter.

When was the last time yellow Mickey, or any of his goons, owned a single one of their Lawswatch comments?

Anonymous said...

WDC Media Releases
Website service - 22/03/07
During the next week, we will be doing some upgrades to our computer network. The work will affect our website and at times the site will not be available for short periods. Please keep checking back. We apologise for any inconvenience

****

The scheduling of this work is no coincidence. Imagine the flak that would be flying if Mickey went to spread his latest brain dump on the ratepayers' website and found the "closed for maintenance" sign up!

So the cowed IT department rearranges their work schedule to do it while he's off Poncing with the Losers. Good idea, guys.

Anonymous said...

The only thing they did wrong with the MMile was have WINC organise it. Apparently there were too many people involved in the organising and no one person actually taking responsibility.

######################################

WINC was set up by Laws, it's his baby, he should take the blame.

Anonymous said...

The Mayoral is manipulative and a prick sometimes (and he'd most likely admit this), get over it, dont let this cloud your judgment. He has put his own cash into alot of causes and devoted his time, theres a heart there somewhere....your prescription = take the blinkers off, walk in grass with bare feet once a day, have a comfy shag with the lights on (with a semi reasonable partner) and it may open that soul. Peace.

9:16 PM, March 22, 2007

So nice to hear from you Miss Lush.

Anonymous said...

the mayor owns EVERY comment in public. that's more than you anon losers (Rob V excepted)

Anonymous said...

So who OWNS the comment (by the "Vision spokesperson") amid Bog's incoherent bullshit in the River Shitty Press today, Mickey?

Anyway, nice to see Richard Moore in your line up; as Rob Muldoon might have said, he's boosted the IQ both inside and outside the diVision tent.

But oh dear, can you possibly be serious about keeping Pep there ... desperate times indeed. But at least her attendance record at the council during her absence over the past year's probably better than the Amazon's at Horizons!

Anonymous said...

A complete wanker posted the following:

-------------------------------
who OWNS the comment (by the "Vision spokesperson") amid Bog's incoherent bullshit in the River Shitty Press today, Mickey?

Anyway, nice to see Richard Moore in your line up; as Rob Muldoon might have said, he's boosted the IQ both inside and outside the diVision tent.

But oh dear, can you possibly be serious about keeping Pep there ... desperate times indeed. But at least her attendance record at the council during her absence over the past year's probably better than the Amazon's at Horizons!

7:56 PM, March 23, 2007

----------------------------------

1. Sue Pepperell (now Reynolds) resigned from council, you moron;
2. Leonie Brookhammer's attendance record at Horizons is irrelevant. Does she make a difference is the criteria?
3. Vision Wanganui won both the last election and the 2 consequent by-elections. they obviously have strong public support AND stand for office.
4. The mayor saved the School of Glass at Ucol. What did you wankers do?

Anonymous said...

Has someone missed the obvious?

Michael Laws is not standing for re-election.

Anonymous said...

the mayor owns EVERY comment in public. that's more than you anon losers

___________________________________

and how exactly are we anonymous when we're "in public", fool?

Don't see pseudonyms on the Chron letters page rooting for anyone but Mickey, either, do we?

So you're not only anonymous here, you Vision lot are anonymous "in public" too. Sorry, what was your point again, 'cos I think I missed it.

Michael, does it depress you that your goons can't come up with better drivel?

Anonymous said...

Please lawswatch change the pic on the site header...
that cartoon of Michael is really nasty and I don't want it on my computer

Laws Watch said...

Sadly it's not a cartoon anon, it's a genuine photograph of Mickey, which we applied a special effect to. We suggest writing to Guyton St and asking that the Mayor wear a mask :-D

Anonymous said...

2. Leonie Brookhammer's attendance record at Horizons is irrelevant. Does she make a difference is the criteria?

******
Dear Mickey

Your loyalty to your paid stooge is touching. Like Pepperell she is a waste of space and time.

Anonymous said...

anonymickey said:
As for the athletics wankers: blah blah blah

Oh dear, they'd better not put their hands out for any more dosh, by the sounds of things. Don't they know that handouts from Mickey come with a price tag?

Anonymous said...

joan street wrote

very rarely say anything now-though read the blog daily.

i so admire rob vinsen for his honest postings.

as for myself-i was such an idiot not to see what ml was really like!

i feel sad for those at the `coalface` who still bear with him and those who post here withoutany real knowledge of his horrific personality.

Anonymous said...

Surely Dr Warbum didn't think he could con Rangitikei into appointing him, given his Employment Court and receivership record, and the way he's so willingly pooped in his nest again in Wanganui?

Face it, without Mickey's desperate need for a lapdog CEO he'd still be picking on knifehands and load-out people at the freezing works.

Apparently his contract at Guyton St is still a secret even to our elected representatives but it's safe to assume he's collected the bonus Mickey promised him.

Anonymous said...

Anonymous said...

Please lawswatch change the pic on the site header...
that cartoon of Michael is really nasty and I don't want it on my computer

1:20 PM, March 24, 2007
****
At first I agreed with this and was about to dob in this site to NetNanny so our children won't be exposed to this nightmarish visage .. then I figured they have to learn about things like Stranger Danger and they're even being taught about voting (yes, even Dotty knows that) so they need to learn about the danger of voting for populist frauds from an early age... so LawsWatch is likely to become compulsory viewing in our household.

Anonymous said...

joan street wrote

i so admire rob vinsen for his honest postings.

________________________________

Joan, you also have taken an honest and similarly admirable stand. Yes, you assisted the worm's progress, but you did the right thing once you saw the truth about Mickey.

Perhaps the best thing you can do now is make sure as wide an audience hears about your experiences - the letter writing fraud, the way you felt manipulated over campaign finances, the way Mickey handles dissent, and of course his "horrific personality".

Perhaps a nice big interview with the Chron. is in order. Get the timing right, though; make sure the election campaign is in full swing. If you're not standing as a candidate that would be even better.

Anonymous said...

To Joan Street:
Took his money tho' didn't you, luvvie? When even the Vision team couldn't get an old fruit like you elected then you "saw the light".
Judas had morals by comparison.

Anonymous said...

How appropriate that just days after desperate, dateless, demented diVision advertises in River City Press that the best “talent” it can find is the likes of No-show Leo and Sue, Grabbit and Run Pepperell, Mickey’s speaking from experience in the Sunday Times today when he says … “Sadly, there will be no shortage of demented and desperate [candidates] seeking easy sinecures”.

Sinecures don’t get any easier than for those two embarrassments who stay away from meetings like the plague but still pocket the money of the ratepayers who were gullible enough to fall for Laws’ bullshit and elected them …. and then they get defended by Mickey for doing so (even here in this blog!).

Anonymous said...

Anonymous said...

joan street wrote

very rarely say anything now-though read the blog daily.
________

Good on you, Joan, for having the guts to speak up ... unlike the rest of the Vision lackeys who love to go round town moaning about their lot but still pocket their salaries and put their hands up when Mickey tells them.

Everyone remembers when Pepperell stood up and apologised about the little jerk while bleating and moaning to anyone who would listen about how perfectly beastly he was and how she was going to jump ship ... but then she not only turned yellow, but helped keep the diVision rust-bucket afloat while continuing to keep her very long snout in the ratepayers' trough from Wellington.

And now she appears on the diVision propoganda trying to recruit a bunch of new suckers ... how much cred has she got????

Anonymous said...

joan street said

without going over old ground i need once more to clarify the cost of standing for `vision` and the fact that --
having paid the $2500 to ml as my cost,according to him of my proposed candidature,i was appalled to find that the costing according to the sheet presented to council officer after the election by ml (unseen by me!) of my standing was twice that!
i told noeline m of my dismay at knowing nothing of this-and was told it was legal for ml to pay extra as he had done!!!!-for me!!!

i remember the conversation with sue p. where she stated,like me,she knew nothing of all this and both of us agreed we would have refused such an offer if we had been asked to accept it.

I TRUST THAT CLEARS THAT UP===LOVIE!

Anonymous said...

Don't be daft Joan. If Mickey had approached you he'd've said "On top of your own contribution you'll receive an extra $2,500 from party coffers for your own personal campaign fund - that's our investment, a symbol of our belief in you, Joan!"

That's what campaign managers do.

And you'd have gone along with it.

That's how Laws and other populists get by. Enough people are prepared to go along for long enough.

Anonymous said...

joan street replies to 4 48 post=

you`re naive!
ml was far too devious to do that!that would have been HONOURABLE!

Anonymous said...

joan street replies to 4 48 post=

you`re naive!
ml was far too devious to do that!that would have been HONOURABLE!

___________________________________

Devious, or so incompetent that he didn't realise that he had to butter you up for it?

Anonymous said...

Joan St. said

"i remember the conversation with sue p."

Joan, would you also describe for us the conversation or conversations surrounding the "false names on letters" scam. Who was present, who said what, that sort of thing.

:)

Anonymous said...

They probably cost more dosh per person entertained than the mayoral mile or the Cooks Concert.
________________________________

"Probably"?

"Entertained"?

When you say "probably", anon, you mean "in my opinion". Which, in my opinion, is worthless.

Since when did the measure of community assets be how "entertaining" they are?

What a clown.

Tell it like it is Joan.

Anonymous said...

Michael Laws + Honour = Oxymoron

Anonymous said...

Joan Street is not credible.

She had all that money spent on her campaign and then says she did not know!

She is the worst kind of pollie: one who after being 'bought' doesn't stay bought.

The bit I don't get is that all the other Vision candidates were "grouped" - that is they got elected within a few hundred votes of each other suggesting group voting for Vision.

But Joan Street was thousands of votes in arrears. As a newcomer to this city, does that mean Wanganui people knew her, and despite the bloc vote, still didn't vote for her?

Could someone clarify that discrepancy for me??

Anonymous said...

joan street replied

i was given by the great man the task of being in charge of letter-writing=this was in the presence of other `vision` candidates at the time
i was to agree to
letters being written by ml(and,perhaps, other candidates) and then i was to have them signed by someone who supported `vision`=from a list to be given to me by ml
nicki higgie and i discussed the morality of this-i refused-and the proposition was dropped... though letters were written by sue`s husband at that time and signed by his mother=remember???

Anonymous said...

Congrats Mrs. Street. You really must talk to the Chronicle. Saturday edition, before the election.

Keeping an eye on Wanganui from Wellington,

Tom Wingfield.

Anonymous said...

JS ..... Well done for speaking out, this is a story your local paper should run with.

Anonymous said...

Joan St. said:

though letters were written by sue`s husband at that time and signed by his mother
_________________________________

Are you saying that Kevin Pepperell brought shame on the Kyokoshin dojo by allowing himself to get involved with such a deceitful practise, Joan?

I wonder what the other teachers there would make of that.

Anonymous said...

Joan's allegation is serious. If this is true Shihan Pepperell has brought great shame upon his dojo

Anonymous said...

Scoop!

Wanganui’s mayor makes total dick of himself on national tv … again!

John Campbell tied Mickey up in knots and dancing Mickey didn’t have a leg to stand on. Just more Lawshit on the gang patches when Campbell put it to him that his headline grabbing anti-PC crap about the anti smacking bill (his current favourite whipping child - apart apparently from his own kids) hardly qualifies him to go all pro-PC and whip (sorry that word again) away civil rights from a section of the Wanganui population.

If you really want to make a laughing stock of yourself on TV, get back to the dancing practice, Mickey and stay away from news and current affairs. They’ve got your number there, MATE!

Anonymous said...

But hasn’t it been good to see the current incumbent doing his bit for Mickey and cynically using Mas to put up that very transparent smokescreen for their absence in Wellington? And now, aren’t the happy couple heading for Hawke’s Bay? Perhaps Mickey will tell her to start a branch office of Vision there and step daintily into Antoinette Beck’s footsteps at the very pinnacle of local govt.

Anonymous said...

Are you joking?
The mayor made John campbell look silly and i was disappointed given that my bias was with Johny Boy. At one stage ML asked JC if he was on drugs!

Anonymous said...

Yes, hold the front page. According to Joan "even Vision couldn't get me elected" Street, nothing happened! Hold the front page ... 'Vision don't rort the election in 2004'.
That's Pulitzer that one!