Wednesday, January 11, 2006

Incoming!!

Welcome, Dear Readers, to a LawsWatch summer special report. Today your favourite blogspot has embedded a reporter on Wanganui’s Direct Democracy Mayoral Spin Chopper One as it tours the mountains, lakes, forests, farms and beaches of New Zealand and beyond seeking out buy-election candidates for re-education Diva-style.

Our intrepid reporter is joined in turn by a fellow embedee from Notional Radio's Soporific Summer Series as we take to the skies at dawn on yet another beautiful January morning for the first sortie in Operation Re-education, with Colonel Laws and Tail Gunner Larry Mitchell.

But first, dear readers, turn off the sizzling sausages and join us for some background to this extraordinary example of Democracy in action...

"Cheap shots score no bullseyes" was the unusally provocative (for the Chron) headline above a story on Monday quoting buy-election candidate Allan Anderson's suspicions that the Diva might be being just a tad alarmist in his buy-election hyperbole.

"Is it safe to live in Wanganui? Or even to venture into the city?" he asked, rhetorically we hope. "… is it safe to walk the crumbling footpaths, drive on our dirt roads, drink the water or even flush the toilet? And, as for bird flu… just forget it. Update your will."

And hitting several nails on the head with a resounding bang, Anderson added, "This is the stuff of populist politics. Denigrate everything in sight and blame the previous administration. It sometimes works and helps deflect attention from one’s own shortcomings. But it does not make for harmonious and constructive decision-making.

"Instead of denigrating all that exists Wanganui needs to acknowledge that most of what is now coming to fruition – roads, footpaths, wastewater scheme and the revamp of the avenue/Mainstreet – was initiated by previous councils," he pointed out, adding presciently "it will take more than a mayoral mile to pay for our sewerage scheme." And our flash new swimming pool, and just about everything else on the buy-election bread and circuses agenda, he might have added.

Such a clear and down-to-earth analysis didn't go unanswered for long. The Diva promptly cranked up the spin machine to announce he was "disturbed" (we've known that all along - Ed.) and accused Anderson of having "no idea how serious the council's state of finances is".

So... because a candidate points out that the city needs to find money - money it doesn't have - to pay for sewerage let alone a swimming pool, that shows he doesn't understand how bad finances are?

Anderson had "obviously [not] read any council document over the past year or the reports of the Audit Office or independent auditors. His lack of awareness is just bizarre." Then leaping deflty from unwarranted assumption to unsupported conclusion, the Diva added that Anderson's comments "did highlight the fact that candidates might not be as knowledgeable as current councillors".

Oh those informed Councillors like Dotty "Professor Phard" McKinnon, perhaps? Or Muzza "what's with all these annoying meetings?" Hughes.

Candidates need not fear, however. The burden of forming their own conclusions will soon be lifted from their shoulders. Just like the present crop of spineless lackeys councillors, candidates are to be deluged with reams of Mayoral spin telling them how to think.

But now we return to our embedded reporter on board Spin Chopper One ...

Since this is the zenith of the holiday season, and candidates need all the relaxation and recharging they can get to prepare for the possibility of two years in the Guyton Street war zone (which is precisely the reason the buy-election was called for this time of the year - Ed.) - Colonel Laws' first stop this morning is a faraway beach on the Chatham Islands and he wastes no time rushing out with his whiteboard and laser pointer, and delivering his briefings to startled sunbathing candidates, one of whom was seen to stir slightly in his lounger and reach for the sunblock at the chopper's approach.

Gunner Larry Mitchell, the Diva's favourite report writer, has come out of retirement on his Puhoi farm, and is handing out remaindered copies of his $44,000 vanity publishing exercise, replete with lots of nice pictures and stories about the Diva's fancy fiscal footwork. One grateful candidate was seen tossing their holiday reading (a work of fiction by that psychopathic pollie Jeffrey Archer) into the surf and plunging into Larry's masterpiece, once the Diva has explained just why and how it is remotely relevant to the business end of WDC.

Meanwhile we can report that en route to the Chathams Gunner Mitchell was able to drop copies of his 50kg bomb on unsuspecting candidates sheltering high in the Southern Alps and walking the Routeburn Track.

Colonel Laws has however issued an official denial to rumours that yesterday's operation struck a snafu when Gunner Mitchell programmed the wrong coordinates into Spin Chopper One's GPS and large quantities of the Mitchell Report were dropped on a Norweigian ski trail, startling Prime Minister Helen Clark and her entourage and prompting her to call the Skyhawks out of mothballs for a defensive action.

Comments on this post are now closed.

24 comments:

Anonymous said...

Watchers, this is a piece of pure fabrication; of course the mayor can't afford a helicopter. Even if he could, we all know he'll never find a pilot, especially now the tag team duo of Steven and Stevens have called down napalm on his position in the Chron. letters today.

Anonymous said...

Er, shouldn't the helicopters be painted in Vision livery, LawsWatch?

And isn't it nice to see whoever runs the council's website letting Mickey use it for his electioneering spin?

Anonymous said...

Anon at 9:08, I think it's lovely to see Wanganui District Council so firmly behind Phillida's campaign. It makes sense really: they picked the WInc board, why shouldn't they pick the next Council too?

Anonymous said...

It's great to get up each morning and read the best newspaper in Wanganui. Keep it up watchers.

Anonymous said...

Catching up with blog news, it's interesting to see comments on a previous anonymous commenter criticising LawsWatch for mentioning the mayor's family in its satirical piece on his Sunday paper column.

Looking at the column, he seems to be trying to tell its readers that he has the indiscriminate sexual mores of a bonobo who suddenly found an interest in fatherhood, and that someone or something he calls the Amazon is pregnant.

Is he referring to the Bonobo Amazonia species, perhaps?

If this is his way of sharing news of a new baby with the world, I wouldn't expect said Amazon or anyone else to be defending him on this blog or elsewhere.

Anonymous said...

Is Rangi Wills the lackey he's made out to be?

Check his latest Councillor comment coming out strongly against the Vision(less) plan to reduce Councillor numbers.

Will the Chron. pick it up, buried as it is: will Helen send them a copy?

Anonymous said...

Stupid quote for the week MUST go to Visions candidate P B-H in todays Chron,.... She said "the mayoral mile in itself many not pay for sewerage but it may just help save a life or two."

What planet does this woman come from?

Anonymous said...

Great posting whoever you guys are ... I love it?

Anonymous said...

See your Mad Mayor is at it again in the national press. Poor old Wanganui always in the paper for something that silly man says.

Anonymous said...

All the stories in Wangas and LW posts this drivel. Get out there & tell us some proper news will you? Like have any candidates approached LW to carry their message - have they been approached - what was their reply?
And the preferred choice is? Anderson, Campion, Simmonds, Waitai?? That makes for a split vote and B-H riding home doesn't it?

Anonymous said...

Tee hee .. Judging from Rangi Wills comment piece today it seems the instinct for self-preservation has triumphed over his desperation to be annointed chief cheerleader for the diVision team.

It turns out Rangi has used his idle diVision voting arm for more intellectual pursuits over the Xmas break.

He's been doing some research, he tells us, and has concluded that one of his fellow (un-named but everyone knows it's Muzza)councillors is a bit misguided in wanting to get rid of a bunch of councillors and run the show by mayoral fiat.

Perhaps Rangi has figured out that there may not be room for Vision hangers-on like him in the new streamlined mayoral decision-making machine.

Anyway, thanks a bundle for this insight, Rangi:

"If the theory of reducing councillors for better decision-making holds weight then rationally the greatest efficiency in decision-making can only be achieved when an organisation is reduced to just the leader. This may be all very well when power is centred in a knowledgeable, benign, altruistic, pure of heart leader but history has shown that the only one that had all those attributes was crucified."

It's on the WDC website under Councillor Comment (and in the inglorious MidWeak for anyone looking for a laugh.

Anonymous said...

anon -- What planet does this woman (Baker Hogan) come from?

------------------------------

I think she's from Planet Spin, anon. And if this is the best the Spin Fairy can do for her candidate then the poor thing obviously needs a holiday.

Anonymous said...

And the preferred choice is? Anderson, Campion, Simmonds, Waitai?
___________________________________

Why don't you go to the trouble of seeing what they stand for and make your own mind up? Being spoonfed by comments here is no better than being spoonfed by Mickey Mayor.

Anonymous said...

Anon 12.28
you may be right about the split vote, we will have to wait and see. B-H has been given a huge advantage with all these candidates standing, the orchestrated timing of the election and of course the only candidate to have access to the spin fairy.
BUT, if she looses after all that, how will it affect the likes of Higgi, Sue and Marty. They will realise that the Diva can't hold the party together just with populist spin. Their standing in this community is now pinned to Laws. Shit who would want to be in that position. Even Rangi is bailing.

Anonymous said...

Dear Lord, Ray!!!

How many times do I have to say it: Come to me first instead of going off to the chron and showing people what a bullshitter and con artists I am.!!!

All my Vision people do what I tell them so I don't see why you can't or won't!!!!

I can see I'll have to start a sitting-councillor re-education offensive just as soon as I've finished with the wanna-be councillors!!!!!

(signed)
Mickey (who's work is never done) Mayor

Anonymous said...

What planet does this woman come from?

__________________________________

Planet Sportsjock. If we're only prepared to be just like her, we can all win olympic gold, or at least carry her pedestal for her.

Anonymous said...

I wondered why the Mitchell report isn't being given away in the Sunday Star Times free books offer - and I did look for a copy in the Warehouse $5 bargain bin to no avail.

But now we know, thanks Watchers, that all those unsold and unwanted copies are being put to good use and being dropped from a great height onto unsuspecting aspiring politicians.

Go Mickey! Go Larry! Up the war to make Wangas safe for democracy!

Anonymous said...

ANON SAID

And the preferred choice is? Anderson, Campion, Simmonds, Waitai?? That makes for a split vote and B-H riding home doesn't it?
***********************************

You forgot Bryn Sinclair, anon. He's my pick to go straight through the middle of the field.

As for B-H, the only home she'll be riding home to will be the one for broken down vision nags if today's piece of stable manure in the chron is any indication of her racing fitness.

Laws Watch said...

have any candidates approached LW to carry their message - have they been approached - what was their reply?

Since it's holiday time, anonymous, you may be forgiven for not keeping up with every post, but before rushing to criticise us for omitting vital information and posting "drivel" you might check the archives as we've already answered this question.

And the preferred choice is?

Who do you think we are? Mickey?! We don't tell people how to vote here at LawsWatch. We merely present the facts the other media don't and allow you to draw your own conclusions.

That makes for a split vote and B-H riding home doesn't it?

Potentially, yes. Someone given to conspiracy theories might say that a few of the candidates have been encouraged to stand purely as spoilers.

We'd suggest those who want an alternative to Vision get organised. Meet to decide who you support, then come out and publicly endorse them, that sort of thing. But time is running out...

Anonymous said...

Good analysis LW but who do we organise behind? I'm not looking for instruction, I'm looking for guidance. I don't know any of these people except Baker-Hogan for her sports and Rana Waitai was an MP> You people may know the candidates but we out here don't. Who are they - who's the best - who is the person likely to cause Laws most grief? This blog assumes that our level of information is your level and that's not the case. So LW - please assist!!!!

Anonymous said...

just read the midweek.
Looks like Rangi must have asked Santa for some testicles for Xmass.
Go captain Rangi, he dosen't like it up him, not one bit

Laws Watch said...

We believe, anonymous @ 8.31 pm, that Mr Maslin's withered organ has awoken to the fact that it has a duty to provide some in-depth coverage of the buy-election and Dave Laurence has been going about interviewing the candidates.

We'd prefer that you learned about them in their own words, so we'll see how well the Chron does in extracting via interview the information we couldn't get from any of them by simply asking them to write it down.

Frankly, if a candidate for office can't answer "who are you and what do you stand for?" without having to be milked of the information a drop at a time, we have to start wondering about the lot of them...

Once the candidates start talking, we'll provide some analysis. But since we don't know equal amounts about each one of them, any attempt to profile the field by us would be very uneven indeed, not to mention somewhat unfair to those not well known by Watchers.

Anonymous said...

"Who is likely to cause Laws most grief?"

I'd say the answer to that is Michael Brian Laws.

Anonymous said...

All this blithering on is just an attempt to keep this site alive when there is nothing current to bash the Diva with.... Yawn, REAL news sells itself without silly stories spun around it.