Thursday, February 23, 2006

The bad boy syndrome

Cat got our tongue, you ask? Would that anything that exciting actually have happened in Wanga-vague-as this past week. With Council on hiatus and new CEO Dr Warburton seemingly intent on keeping Mad Mickey sedated (elephant tranquiliser? GHB? Ecstacy? A rubber mallet?) Watchers have been making forays out of the Cave to stock up on winter firewood and catching up on our crocheting.

You mean to tell us Mr Maslin's limpid organ hasn't been keeping you fully and completely informed of every angle of every issue facing Wanganui? Now there's a surprise. An increasingly irritable editor seems to have started the year somewhat out of sorts, making mischief with photo captions during the buy-election, overlooking the need for solid information on which people could base their decisions on referendumb issues, and testily telling his own journalists that the Chronic won't be expanding on its recent foray into examining political accountability.

Watchers got quite excited when the paper asked its readers whether they thought list MP Jill Pettis ought to be accountable to Wanganui (the town) and Whanganui (the electorate) even though she theoretically no longer represents either.

A fair question to ask about any list MP who, as the Diva proved beyond doubt a decade ago, stand or fall solely on their ability to curry favour with the powerbrokers within their own party. Mrs Pettis seems no better nor worse than the bulk of them (though not every list MP's voice makes Watchers' ears bleed if heard within 100 metres) but, we naively thought, if political accountability is suddenly on the Chronic's agenda, can a look at the accountability of certain other elected figures be far behind.

Well no, it can't. Mr Maslin curtly explained to a quavering un-bylined journo (or indeed, perhaps he told his own word processor) that even Chester Borrows wouldn't come in for the same level of scrutiny applied to Mrs Pettis, because he "was elected by the Whanganui electorate, to which he is clearly accountable".

Really? How? How is any elected person - list MP, electorate MP, councillor or Mayor - held accountable during their term of office? Not at all, sadly. They're "accountable" once every three years -- after they've been hand picked by a few insiders to represent one party or the other. If we don't like their performance we're faced with the choice of voting for someone representing a party we may not like, or abstaining and using only our party vote. And if we don't like a list MP, the only way we can affect their chances is to use our party vote aganist their entire line-up. Not nearly as effective, accountability-wise, as, say, a
recall election.

Whether they ought to be accountable during their term, and -- assuming it's thought to be desirable -- how it might be implemented is, we would have thought, a very worthy question for debate in the local newspaper. Unless the intention was to just pick on someone who's annoyed the new boy power structure, of course. But we're sure that wasn't the intention, given that the Chronic is a serious newspaper.

Perhaps when his own newsroom started asking "Who's next for the accountability exam?" Mr Maslin realised that he'd opened the way for such questions to be asked of Guyton Street. And we can't have that, now can we?

Meanwhile, between the foraging and the crocheting, Watchers have been pondering the evident attractions of the Diva for at least a portion of the Wanganui population. Indeed, there seems to be a perverse percentage whose support for the Mayor rises in inverse proportion to the standard of his behaviour.


Of course this isn't the first time that a leadership figure who's behaved somewhat poorly has been idolised by a section of the population that might reasonably be expected to oppose them -- Margaret Thatcher kept getting re-elected by many of the same people whose livelihoods she was destroying and whose homes she was ruthlessly poll-taxing. And on the other side of the spectrum, crowds still turn out to cheer Fidel despite the Cuban version of Manolo Blahniks being jandals made from worn out car tyres.

Latest to join the "ruthless but revered (by some)" stakes is US VP Dick Cheney, who as you all know by now shot his friend in the face while quail hunting. (The friend later apologised to the VP for getting in the way of his buckshot). This is the same Dick Cheney who told Senator Patrick Leahey to go f**k himself on the floor of the Senate, and then said he "felt better after I had done it". Who has two DUIs under his belt. Whose former Chief of Staff Lewis "Scooter" Libby has been indicted by a Grand Jury and charged with several felonies (Libby reportedly said that his superiors, including Dick Cheney, had authorised him to disclose highly classified information to the press regarding Iraq's weapons intelligence).

The same Dick Cheney who's been charged with fraudluent accounting. Whose oil company, Halliburton, is regularly embroiled in charges of bribery and corruption dating back to when he was in charge -- and who made $36 million from selling his shares in said company. Who's widely regarded as the architect of much that's happened in Iraq and who has a long history of misbehaviour dating back to the Iran-Contra scandal. And so on...

But the latest effort by Deadeye Dick hasn't affected his popularity much, slipping from 32 to just 29 after the hunting incident.

Perhaps Wonkette comes closest to offering a coherent explanation of this phenomenon. Comparing Cheney to that other renowned US VP Spiro Agenew, they ask:

Did [Agnew] ever say 'go f**k yourself' on the floor of the Senate? Did he ever dress like he was shoveling his suburban driveway to a memorial service at Auschwitz? Did he ever shoot a man in cold blood? No. We didn’t think so. Agnew’s a pussy and you know it. Dick Cheney is a badass, and we love him.

He’s like America’s abusive father — we’re terrified of him, we hide under our beds when we smell whiskey on his breath, but we crave his attention. We need him to tell us we’ve been good.

We have a sick admiration for him that we’ll be describing to our therapists for years.

Do Vice Presidents have term limits? Can he please be our Vice President-for-life?
Mickey, Mayor for Life? We're sure there's some who'd put up their hands. Let's just hope for their sakes the Diva doesn't own a shotgun.

Comments on this post are now closed.

25 comments:

Anonymous said...

Oh dear, Lawswatch has turned it's soapbox toward global politics. First we lose the humour and now the interest. Ho hum.

Anonymous said...

Read the mayor's latest media release? I'd say he had the CEO by the balls rather than the other way round. Your thoughts?

Anonymous said...

The Chron should ask the plumbers in Wanganui what they think about the water softening. The ones I've asked all think it's a 'no goer'.

Anonymous said...

Who would have thought Derek Lessware would be the one to prick Mickey's pipes? Wonder if Mr Rewiti had warned his boss about the wee lime build-up problem? Looks like LawsWatch mightn't be the only place to look for leaks if Mickey goes down the softening track.

Anonymous said...

Oh boy Lawsey was in a foul mood when he wrote his column, many quarters get a serve including Wanganui Inc.

He is a director of Winc himself, so he may as well start with a public bum slapping of himself first...actually take a rain check on that, I think the publicity and kinkiness may appeal to his vanity.

I feel sorry for the new CEO of Winc as he seems a genuinely nice bloke, doing his best to bring together a variety of community organisations who were running on the smell of an oily rag (going by the submissions on the new entity). Ive noticed Winc was heavily involved in the running of many of the recent events, including the Mayoral Mile (Sport Wanganui also did a great job with this one). As we all know the on the ground stuff is a much harder thing to achieve than a destructive populace aimed one-liner strategy.

The saving grace is that there are some excellent positive elements amoungst the rest of the Board of Winc, and Laws has limited influence there.

I still believe Laws has been a positive influence on Council (without detracting from the past), but we should all acknowledge he wont have the loyalty or people skills for an extended stay (which will buggar this Blog up wont it :-))

Anonymous said...

He said he would do it and it appears as if council have backed him to a man/woman/dog - cut staff and services. The worst part is that the average ratepayer will cheer not jeer.

Anonymous said...

The 12,000 - 4,000 vote suggests that water softening is another populist cause championed by this Teflon mayor.

Laws Watch said...

First we lose the humour and now the interest. Ho hum

Critics are like eunuchs in a harem; they know how it's done, they've seen it done every day, but they're unable to do it themselves.
-- Brendan Behan

:-)

Anonymous said...

Lawswatch, not sure if your last comment is a criticism of the anon comment or a summary of your own political performance recently.

Seems to work quite well for both...

Anonymous said...

I'm sure someone will tell me how the new CEO is keeping the mayor under control. In fact, he seems to be using the new chum's inexperience by cutting 1/2 a million off staff salaries and then telling Dr D to figure out who gets the bullet.
The Chronicle had it wrong again this morning (surprise surprise) because the word is Cr Ray actually led the lynch mob to chop staff positions at the gallery. message to Ray: if you're going to protest staff cuts, don't do it in front of the all the staff at a council workshop. It was all round Guyton St on Friday that the council had approved the job cuts on the Thursday night and the talk of the Grand.

Anonymous said...

The hot goss around my arts friends is that councilors have ganged up on the gallery again in terms of funding. Tell us we're wrong but a council staff member tells us that some of the older councilors were leading the slashing & burning.

Anonymous said...

My previous comment regarding an email sent to staff from Warburton straight after ML's did the rounds seems to have been 'moderated' maybe it broke a rule?

However. Interesting to see ML say in Saturday's Chron that he has had several meetings with "the staff" can I just clarify that it has been "one". Not a meeting as such but a request that all staff go to the memorial Hall to hear him speak. During this (inaugural) speech he said he would be repeating this on a regular basis - hasn't happened in 18 months.

One thing that was said during this "speech" was "we plan to run at 100kph to get things done and we would like staff to run with us" little did we know that said run was a 100kph sprint to the end. (of our jobs).

If jobs are to go then lets start with the posts that have been invented around the Mayoral office. Lets get rid of the positions that did not exist before ML came into office. It is unfortunate that you can only manage half days but employing "cover" at the expense of our jobs is not on.

Your ego will drive this town to bankrupsty but you won't care... the stepping stone called Wangas will have served it's purpose and you will be down in Wellington

Anonymous said...

"the council had approved the job cuts on the Thursday night"

Oh really? At what Council meeting? Or are you talking about a committee? Are are you just full of shit? All the way up to the brim, whrereupon it starts spilling out of your mouth all over your nice clothes.

Anonymous said...

Council staff stunned.... what a load of rubbish, they've been talking about staff cuts for months. The staff themselves have been surmising for months. Suddenly they are 'stunned'? I doubt it.

Anonymous said...

Wonder if Helen Lawrence's name is on Mickey's (sorry, Dr Warburton's) hit list.

And wouldn't this be a good time for councillors to start asking hard questions about the swimming pool - not just the capex but the ongoing running costs.

Anonymous said...

Anonymous said...
The hot goss around my arts friends is that councilors have ganged up on the gallery again in terms of funding. Tell us we're wrong but a council staff member tells us that some of the older councilors were leading the slashing & burning.

10:26 AM, February 26, 2006

++++++++++++++++++++++

How can this be? Wasn't the appointment of the librarian supposed to be the end of pollies deciding how much the gallery gets vs the museum vs the libary? Or was that just another bunch of spin? Is there or is there not going to be a single Queens Park sum for Ms P to share around, with the wisdom of Solomon, no doubt?

Anonymous said...

Before the buy eleciton the Chron suppressed Cr Ray's stories, now it keeps them off its website so the rest of enzed just sees the mayoral press releases, and the editor gives Ray a ticking off in his little piece of Saty shite.

Speaking of which, does anyone know what the Spin Fairy's deadline is to get our impartial editor's copy written for him?

Laws Watch said...

My previous comment regarding an email sent to staff from Warburton straight after ML's did the rounds seems to have been 'moderated' maybe it broke a rule?

No, anon... we moderated no such comment. We're sorry about that. Blogger's commenting has been going haywire lately, with up to 6 copies of the same comment ending up in the moderation queue. Perhaps others are disappearing.

Our apologies. Feel free to re-post.

Anonymous said...

If the WDC staff were "shocked" by the newws that jobs would be lost then they're complete dickheads. I'm an outsider ands I've read my Chronicle for months and Laws has been flagging retrenchment for that long. In fact he directly said (check his website under Rates & Finance policy) that council staff costs were too high.
I mentoned this to my partner over the weekend and she said - get this - Council staff have Vision policies loaded on their own internal website. Can they not read?

Anonymous said...

The mayor holds a "town hall' meeting every month and a number of staff attend. I've been and he flagged staff cuts last year on a number of occasions. If the staff are too lazy (or disinterested?) to go then they deserve everything coming their way. Wanganui won't weep if local bureaucrats lose their jobs - the politics are all on the mayor's side.

Anonymous said...

Big scoop by Checkpoint just now in the wake of today's nastiness in Wangas - an interview, no less, with the most vile leader of the most dangerous gang in town. Yes folks, Mary managed to track down none other than Mad Mick of the Vision gang. Pity no-one but a few thousand thinking ratepayers listen to public radio, eh Mickey?

Anonymous said...

Q. If, as Mickey says, when 4 out of 5 people don't want the H we don't get the H, perhaps he could suggest Baker-Hogan graciously disappears because by his reckoning, 4 out of 5 people sure as hell don't want the B-H.

Anonymous said...

The Diva looked extremely stressed out on the TV last night.

Anonymous said...

Stressed out? More like he he was trying to remember what sincerity looks like and failing miserably.

Anonymous said...

Phew - Maestro Maslin has finally debuted the Mickey and Chester Show, after all those weeks of rehearsals and sneak previews. There they were on page three yesterday, Mickey tap dancing, Chester on the fiddle and Mas conducting the Vision orchestra.

Has anyone seen The Producers? Mel Brooks would surely have snapped up this lot of hackneyed hacks and pathetic pollies, and given them a short run off St Hill St before the punters tumbled to their total lack of talent and ideas.

Chester should have talked to his boss Burlesque Brash, about the danger of being cast with lunatic fringe players like diVision and the Brethren, and stuck to his Chaplinesque solo comic routine.