Wednesday, March 01, 2006

...and He taketh away

We've always suspected the Diva of having a messianic complex. So it's little wonder that not only does the Lord giveth and the Lord taketh away, but that Mickey is having a go too.

Not only are staff cuts on the agenda (and commenters are right, these should come as a surprise to no one, least of all the staff themselves) but cuts to services as well.

Oh, and a potential seven percent rates rise "just to stand still".

And whose fault is all this?

Surely not the Visionites, who rode to power on the back of promises of "nil" rates rises and improvements to services like gleaming new swimming pool extensions? Capping expenditure while increasing services has never been managed by any administration at any level anywhere, but that didn't stop the Diva. And to his credit, he managed to fool enough of the people enough of the time to get elected.

While lopping a few public servants off at the knees was always clearly on the agenda, Watchers can't remember the words "rates rises" let alone "borrowing" being used by the Diva's dwarves -- not even during the recent buy-election.

But they hadn't been in office a year when their hands went into the cookie jar and emerged with a $2.4 million loan. And now Wanganui-ites are being softened up for a rates rise which was always inevitable in a town which had essentially been left to stagnate in many respects.

No one likes a rates rise, but an honest politician would have put their cards on the table, presenting a list of unavoidable expenses (like, say, stormwater) and optional expenses (like, say, pool extensions) complete with budgets and allowed people to make intelligent decisions about what they wanted and how much they were prepared to pay to get it.

Instead, voters were led to believe that they could have a brand spanking new swimming pool and a redeveloped town centre (but not an art gallery that even met health and safety requirements) without having to fork across an extra cent in rates.

"Eey oop," they said, in that charmingly bucolic way they have, "if anyone's that clever with money, they'll get my vote! Why, I'll send the missus up Guyton Street to ask that clever bloke how she can serve t-bone steak every night without me having to give her any more housekeeping!".

According to the Diva this is everyone's fault but his, of course, telling the Chronic it was all down to "new audit requirements" and "some [items] missed out in the last [LTCCP] plan" and confirming "cuts to some council services and to staff numbers".

When even a casual observer of Wanganui's finances pre-Vision could see that the town was facing ongoing infrastructure costs such as stormwater separation and the wastewater treatment plant, let alone the costs of any wishlist projects such as the Heart or the Splash Centre, to now claim that the imminent belt-tightening has somehow snuck up on Council means one of two things. Either Vision was stupid, or they were dishonest.

It's not their fault they're now faced with having to make staff redundant, cut services, raise rates, or some combination of all three. It's not their fault they couldn't deliver increased services and infrastructure without increasing the rates burden and / or cutting back in other areas. No one could have been expected to achieve those things.

The point is, though, that no one else promised to, and got themselves elected on the basis of that promise.

Comments on this post are now closed.

45 comments:

Anonymous said...

Not everybody has been taken in by our mayor's latest anti-gang grandstanding. National Radio just now had Denis O’Reilly saying Laws is "getting a bit hysterical and mixing up his radio talkback role with being mayor". And ain't that the truth.

Anonymous said...

LawsWatch ..."to now claim that the imminent belt-tightening has somehow snuck up on Council means one of two things. Either Vision was stupid, or they were dishonest."
+++++++++++++++++
Wrong, Laws Watch. Vision wasn't EITHER stupid or dishonest, they were, and are, BOTH stupid and dishonest.

Anonymous said...

Vision wasn't EITHER stupid or dishonest, they were, and are, BOTH stupid and dishonest. ,,,

.. as in, the mayor is dishonest and Crs Higgie, Lindsay et al are just plain stoopid?

Anonymous said...

Tut tut dearies. vision runs Wanganui, and long will it continue so choke on that will you???

Anonymous said...

Is LawsWatch illiterate? I only ask because it was made clear in the Chronicle that the anticipated rate rise will be to compensate for inflation & not the 7% suggested here. The mayor clearly said that the 7% was unacceptable which is why staff & services are going to go. Hell, it's bad when I have to read the Chronicle to get more accurate info than in here. Lift your game, LawsWatch!!

Anonymous said...

Vision are neither stupid nor dishonest because they said what they were going to do & are now doing it. While council staff still have a tea-lady to serve them tea then the rest of Wangas will applaud the mayor's moves to take on these lazy pampered bureaucrats.

Anonymous said...

Laws is dead right on gangs. Why don't you people in here admit that the guy has guts.

Laws Watch said...

Is LawsWatch illiterate?

No. Are you? Because we said:

...make staff redundant, cut services, raise rates, or some combination of all three.

So, if they go through with their promise of listening to public input, the Council could do any or all of the above or, most likely, some combination that mitigates the worst effects of each (a few redundancies, some cuts to services, a small rates rise).

Tut tut dearies.

Good to hve you back, Michael.

Anonymous said...

anon

While council staff still have a tea-lady to serve them tea then the rest of Wangas will applaud the mayor's moves to take on these lazy pampered bureaucrats.

9:07 PM, March 01, 2006

************
No, Mickey, they will not - at least not while you have your own personal spin fairy to serve up your spin and perpetuate the myth that you yourself come at no cost to the ratepayers.

Anonymous said...

"Laws is dead right on gangs."

***********************************

Laws, with his abusive language, will be partly responsible for any increase in gang activity.

At least the Chron. has it right for once: it's not about P. There's ongoing emnity between the HA and MM in Wanganui that has nothing to do with day-to-day business.

"Why don't you people in here admit that the guy has guts."

You have to have principles to have guts. Laws has neither.

Anonymous said...

Tut tut dearies ...
I'm not Michael Laws - I just adore what he does to your minds! Did you people have a purpose in life before he gave you one?

Laws Watch said...

You're right, anon. Before Mickey came along we were devoid of so many things, mirth and entertainment being chief amongst them. Your hero's pathetic endeavours to draw attention to himself and thus somehow validate his existence has changed our lives, and for that we are truly grateful. When Mickey gets his comeuppance, we'll be reduced to poking fun at, ohhh... maybe this guy.

Anonymous said...

good grief that guys a sick puppy...
ML is no where near that far gone ...surely ?

Bit worried about the " my kid saw me get out of shower" quip though...How the heck did he weave that into a supermarket opening speach ?

Anonymous said...

I hear the "guest of honour" did a no show at the Relay for Life at the weekend. Perhaps he'd run out of fantastically stupid things to say after his Tourette's overcame his attempts to sound mayoral at the supermarket opening.

Anonymous said...

Mickey says: "We can assist by banning gang patches and regalia from the CBD"
+++++++++++++++

Good, perhaps this will see the exit of the diVision banner at Guyton St.

... And anyone who sets foot in the mayoral office wearing a diVision-patched tee shirt will be packed off to Kaitoke Prison and sentenced to watch endless repeats of Mickey's gang-busting speeches.

Anonymous said...

Rage on little people. No-one cares.

Anonymous said...

Could someone get Matt and Jay Kuten to stop writing letters to the Chronicle because against the bigger issues it's starting to look petty and silly.

Anonymous said...

Anonymous said...
I hear the "guest of honour" did a no show at the Relay for Life at the weekend.


Yes but that’s because the dim organisers didn’t call it the Mayoral Relay for Life. Apparently the sign writers are busy changing the supermarket signage right now since Mickey obviously cut a deal to show up and do his foot in mouth stunt, providing they call it the Mayoral New World.

Anonymous said...

Michael Vs The Gangs - it's an unfair fight. That bully mayor.

Laws Watch said...

Rage on little people. No-one cares.

Well you care enough to rage on at us at 5.30am, for one thing.

But you're right, complacency rules right now. Very few people give two damns about anything that's written here. That's because the Chron is doing an excellent job of beating up the gang issue et al and playing down the impending fiscal road crash, and, frankly, people have more important things on their minds, like whether they bought enough 3-ply at the Mayoral New World.

But shortly it'll grab them right where it hurts -- their wallets and / or the services they receive -- and then we'll see who's raging.

Anonymous said...

I was the Relay for Life - Michael Laws was there, did the closing ceremony and presented a personal cheque for $1,000 so no idea where you got that earlier info.

Anonymous said...

Agree with the last LW issue: this blog is losing interest and so is all the anti-vision stuff. The by-election took the wind out of my sails with more Vivi-section councillors than even in 2004. Wanganui is a closed mind society and does not deserve its art fraternity. Emma C doing good work boycotting the Open Studios w/end and M-Anyon too - may be we should all turn our backs.

Anonymous said...

I agree with the earlier comments about letters to the editor at this point in time. Wanganui is facing a crisis and we look petty and immature if we keep on at the moment. I'm hearing a lot of community support for the mayor's stance and attacking him now is not in our long-term best interests.
Also a message to Jay K: Jay, people know you only live here six months of the year before going back to summer in Boston. Keeping the "blowtorch" applied, as you put it, can't be a part-time thing - just a thought.

Anonymous said...

I can confirm the Mayor did the pleasantries at the closing ceremony of the Relay For Life and that he presented one of his cheques. Chas did the opening ceremony but I heard it cost to fly him down from auckland. Is that right?

Anonymous said...

If Laws Watch hasn't been as effective in recent months then it is because it doesn't add anything to the sum knowledge of Whanganui residents.
If it had stuck to original premise and not had anonymous authors then it would have been an asset to the town. Also it was always personal in its attacks and that turned people off.
I think you should rename and relaunch the site with regular contributors like Rob Vinsen, Emma Camden, Fred Frederickse and get people to write on issues that are of relevance to the city and their council. Morgs Hunter would be a good addition too.
At the moment, the postings are too irregular to be useful & contain no new information or insight.
Laws Watch (whoever the author is now) - you say that people have got lethargic but that exposure of Carol Webb, Matt Dutton and the guy from Australia didn't help. If others are to be accused of dishonesty then you have to be squeaky clean yourself, n'est pas?

Laws Watch said...

Thanks for a reasoned critique, anonymous.

If it had stuck to original premise and not had anonymous authors...

The premise was always to have anonymous authors, the feeling being that Laws would launch exactly the type of reprehensible personal attacks against anyone he thought responsible that he in fact did some months ago.

Also it was always personal in its attacks and that turned people off...

As opposed to, say the Mayor's good natured, polite and reasonable response to his critics? This site's raison d'etre is to examine and critique the Mayor's performance in elected office - as such, what could it be other than personal?

With the exception of some appalling, unpardonable comments attacking his family (which we didn't used to be able to control but did delete as soon as we saw them, and now moderate so they're never seen) we stand by anything that's been published here about the Mayor as fair and reasonable comment on a public figure.

I think you should rename and relaunch the site with regular contributors...

Anyone is welcome to contribute to LawsWatch, anonymously or with a byline. Morgs Hunter has submitted material which has been published as posts and regularly makes named comments, as does Rob Vinsen. Our email is well publicised, and we welcome any submissions.

Having said that, your idea is an excellent one, which we hope someone will take up. It's easily achieved for free using sites such as Blogger, Typepad et al.

At the moment, the postings are too irregular to be useful & contain no new information or insight.

Laws' attack on the people you name - whose offence, after all, was simply holding opinions contrary to his own - has effectively deterred many people from submitting information lest they too be vilified from the Mayoral bully pulpit, precisly as it was intended to. And you can hardly blame them.

The answer, quite simply, is for people to decide they won't be cowered and to resume contributing. Whatever happens, however, the blog remains as an unpredictable, and uncontrollable, outlet for any information which does come it's way - which we consider a function of sufficient importance to be worth the time to maintain it.

In short, plase feel free to improve the quality of LawsWatch by contributing - anonymously or otherwise - facts, opinion, and scuttlebutt.

Anonymous said...

Wot's a scuttlebutt?

Anonymous said...

I still really enjoy this blog, and reading about the Mad Mayor of Wanganui, please don't think about leaving us, it's so much fun to read about this silly little man and his friends.

Anonymous said...

Mayor Michael will have the support of most of Wanganui's law abiding citizens in taking a stand on gangs. I, for one, think that his, and the police's, no tolerance approach is laudible and much overdue, and in Michaels's case, quite courageous. Chas Poynter experienced uncomfortable reprisals on his home and family once - and Michael has taken this risk also. Banning gang patches from the CBD may yet prove to be unenforcible, but this is an issue that Michael will have Wanganui right behind him on.

Anonymous said...

Check the council website. One of Mickey's non-performing assets just became a liability

Anonymous said...

Whatever our criticisms of the guy, Laws has never lacked courage.

Anonymous said...

My 1st thought when I read his statements to the Chronic....
I'm glad I'm not his neighbour!

Anonymous said...

"Whatever our criticisms of the guy, Laws has never lacked courage."

+++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++

Riiiiight, like it's so courageous to use deceit as a political tool. It's realy brave to call people names rather than address their arguments.

Laws is a bully; all bullies are cowards. He and the mob deserve one another.

Anonymous said...

Love Ross's letter in the paper! What a great idea ... extremely creative.

Anonymous said...

Are Ken Mair and The Mayor in league?
Word around council is that the former has taken a human rights grievance against the latter over the Whanganui spelling, making them both look great to their respective constituents. This is a luckier mayor than he should be.

Anonymous said...

Looks like the 'H' debate will not go away ... it's all the Diva's own making so let him have it Ken.

Anonymous said...

anonymayor said...

blah blah blah blah ... making them both look great to their respective constituents. This is a luckier mayor than he should be.

9:53 PM, March 07, 2006
++++++++++++++++++++++++++++

Wouldn't it be nice if just once in while, anonymayor pretended to be more interested in the kind of community building that is generally held to be part of mayoral responsibilities, and less greedy for talkback career-building opportunities to divide and conquer, and vilify sections of the community.

Anonymous said...

The H 'debate' is great value for his Lawsuit...divide and conquer still works

Anonymous said...

The more Mair attacks the mayor, the more the latter mayor gets votes. Two great populist issues have fallen the way of a populist mayor and he's playing them superbly when both Ray Stevens and Rob Vinsen publicly back him. An earlier commenter said Laws was lucky with his enemies - that's for real!

Anonymous said...

Little birds are whispering that there could be some very red faces at the Chron as a result of police investigations into management eavesdropping on conference calls between the union head office and site delegates during the strike action last year. So far the focus has been on Hawkes Bay but watch this space....

Anonymous said...

RE WDC JOB CUTS
In the chron today "The proposed draft community plan was hammered into shape last month at three council workshops. They examined policies, activity budgets and what senior strategic analyst Charlotte Hume calls “other key issues.”
_ _ _ _ _
Senior Strategic Analyst??? Does this mean we have a number of Junior Strategic Analysts as well? What does a strategic anaylst get paid for running workshops no one wants? Sounds like the CEO can cut a few jobs quite quickly without impacting on real council services in any way!

Anonymous said...

Deputy Dotty said:
we need in-house expertise at strategic management level ... We need the right people at the right level to assist us to make the big (and probably hard) decisions to reach our growth targets...
Watch this space.

*********************

Now that's a good ideea, Dotty (or whoever wrote your column for you this week). Let's get Larry Mitchell in as the resident genius at Guyton St!

Anonymous said...

Come on gguys! It's been over a week since your last post!

Anonymous said...

Dot says..
Watch this space.

Do you think she means the space between her ears?

Seriously though, this drip-feeding of Vision policy and pending practice by hints and innuendo is a continuing insult to non-Vision councillors and the ratepayers.

Anonymous said...

DearLawsWatch,
I've noted some of the comments from people who are frustrated that the once daily postings are still not happening. That is probably because only a very few people are doing all the work and they've had a gutsfull trying to be the conscience of this town - which is why Emma, Ross MA, Carol etc are getting on with running their own businesses and lives. They fought the good fight and no-one stood beside them. The mayor and his mates picked them off one by one and where was the protest?
All we now get are the same few writing the same letters to the newspaper and that is creating even more that sense of hopelessness.
I'm out of here. I'm going somewhere where people like me are appreciated and not criticised for being creative and wanting to hold The Man to account for their actions. Wanganui doesn't deserve me, the arts activists or LW.