Monday, March 27, 2006

The (ratepayer) hustle

Idle Sunday afternoon musings at the Cave have devised a plausible answer for this whole Splash Centre mess. We realise now that the Diva wanted to demonstrate his fleet footwork to the producers of Dancing with the Stars who, given the shallow celebrity pool in NZ, must now be scanning lists of people who once had a walk-on part in Close to Home.

Fortunately for the Diva he's got people like Nickie Higgie on the judging panel. Forwarded a lucid, reasonable and well-thought-out email from a concerned Watcher, who pleaded with LawsWatch to ask Cr Higgie whether she had any concern at all for the arts in Wanganui, Nickie shot back with "I haven't read anything below, and won't be". Way to answer to constituents Nickie, but pretty much the lickspittle, craven performance we'd warned the Watcher they were likely to get. Then again, perhaps we're being harsh - there were some awfully big words in that email.

And then there's Mr Maslin, whose scorecard - at least when it comes to the Diva's dancing - seems to have only "10" on it. Perhaps he's hoping he won't be a wallflower at the next round of Vision candidate selections and will be asked to dance with the Diva. Just don't expect to lead.

While we at the Cave wait for those who are paid to serve the voters and readers to wake up and smell the chlorine, Watchers have been doing a little probing. However unlike Leisure Suit Larry Mitchell, the bean counter from Puhoi, we won't wrap up the results up in a $44,000 tome illustrated with pictures of the mayor and council and peppered with quotes from the Diva.

The first question we ask is from where did the recommendation in Keith Hindson's report that the council underwrite the entire project come? Especially remembering that it continues to blow out by a daily amount exceeding even Larry Mitchell's consulting fee. It doesn't sound like the sort of thing we've come to expect from Cautious Keith, nor from the level headed Barbara Bullock, chair of the Working Party.

Of course when the mayor gave birth to the genetically challenged Working Party he had co-parenting rights with his buddy Graeme Taylor and was also in throes of infatuation with his other good buddy John Unsworth. GK got to chair the Working Party to get the project up and running, while JU was left to come up with the readies on the Fundraising Committee. Mickey promised he would spread his affections and "talents" between both families. Then-CEO and marriage counsellor Colin Whitlock thought that was a pretty good arrangement.

Then GK walked out on the marriage and the Working Party was put up for adoption. Cr Barbara Bullock found herself loco in parentis while Mickey wooed sports chick Baker-Hogan.

That left the new mother in the midst of a dysfunctional mixed family trying to focus on getting the costings and design messes sorted and mapping out a sensible series of options.

Poppa Unsworth was never home, driving round with his pals Marty Lindsay et al, wooing car dealers for a free RAV to raffle in an attempt to come up with some of the $1.5 million shortfall.

Then somehow at least three of the Unworth gang, known as the street bullies, came to play with the Bullock brood. Could that be why the Hindson-Bullock recommendations morphed into something that sounded like the Fundraising Committee's wish list?

With that sort of cross-pollination it was never going to work the way Colin Whitlock predicted. Poppa Unsworth and Uncle Michael wanted as much dough as they could get (without actually having to work for it) and bugger the ratepayers, while Momma Bullock was charged with protecting the ratepayers by ensuring the thing didn't spin out of control.

Now the neighbours are whispering over the fence that Momma Bullock has been served with divorce papers and Uncle Michael is wondering what to do next.

Where is the family GP, Dr Warburton, in all this, we ask? Perhaps it's time for him to prescribe a dose of fiscal reality and see what he can do to revive the project. Oh, and he might like to focus on diagnosing the seriousness of the increased running costs and figuring out just what the ratepayers can afford during the life of the project.

Comments on this post are now closed.

26 comments:

Anonymous said...

Higgie... rings a bell.
Wasn't she elected some time ago? Along with that Michael bloke?
Since the election I, as a WDC, employee, have never clapped eyes on her. Nor P-BH, nor Marty-FM, nor... (would you believe I'm struggling to remember who the vision councillors are) ummm... nope! other than Hughes, Dot (needed directions up the stairs) and a singular sighting of Sue Pepper they are all conspicuos by their absence. Seen plenty of Sue Westwood who can often be found talking to staff members. As for ML he began his "reign" doing 5 arvos a week, these days it's considerably less. We could raise some splash centre funds by leasing out his vacant car park!

God how I wish ratepayers/voters could see the real picture :(

Anonymous said...

Anonymous said...
How cosy. REG and Harold both seem to keep the same morning ablutions schedule as our mayor. Presumably they also run on three ply.

3:58 PM, March 27, 2006

+++++++++++++++++++++++++++

This is the kind of paranoia that discredit the watchers. Harold Land has been an exceptional commementator on this blog and has not been pro-Laws at all. But now HE'S the mayor too! Isn't it time, moderator, you stopped this anonoymous posting because not one scoop has been posted here by anonymous comnmenators.

Anonymous said...

Look on the bright side.

Anonymous said...

Lets identify all the guilty parties (according to LawsWatch) and see if they're the problem or LW (and the few watchers) is. Guilty;
His Darkness, the Mayor
Deputy Dot
All Vision councillors
All rest of WDC councillors
CEO Dr Warburton
Editor John Maslin & Chronicle
Rivercity Press
Chamber of Commerce
Everyone who voted for Laws/Vision
Everyone who voted Baker-Hogan
All rural who voted Taylor
John Unsworth & Splash promoters
Morgs Hunter & Youth Council
Ratepayers Association
Graeme Adams & GreyPower
Chester Borrows MP
Winston Peters & NZ First ...
... is there anyone left.
Now ask yourself this question.
Who's REALLY out of step with Wanganui??

Laws Watch said...

Isn't it time, moderator, you stopped this anonoymous posting because not one scoop has been posted here by anonymous comnmenators.

Well, depends on the definition of scoop we suppose. Morgs, Rob Vinsen and others have used this blog to release information that wouldn't generally have been known before.

Read the comment right above you and you'll see a mini sort-of scoop, if you define it loosely as "stuff most people probably didn't know".

But scoops aren't the purpose of comments, anon. They're simply here to let people such as yourself express an opinion without finding your name vilified in tomorrow's Chron letters page by a patently non-existent author.

Oh, and to let Mickey pretend that some of the irrational abuse hurled around in here isn't really from him. It's like watching a fly in a jar. But one that says "Buzzing? Crapping everywhere? You must have me mistaken for this earwig that was just here a minute ago..." :-D

Anonymous said...

It was patently obvious on Thursday that the mayor's out of town sojourn on Wednesday meant he hadn't gotten around to reading the agenda. The good news is it looks like Laws-free Wednesdays are back, folks.

Anonymous said...

... is there anyone left.
Now ask yourself this question.
Who's REALLY out of step with Wanganui??
.............
I think the moral of the story is, Micheal, that everything you touch turns to shit.

Laws Watch said...

Who's REALLY out of step with Wanganui??

Interesting argiment you put there anon. We'll overlook the fact that much of it is inaccurate - we've waded into comments to support Morgs, allowed him space in posts to communicate information, and wished his not-to-be candidacy well and we've never mentioned Chester Borrows in a post (other than mentioning his name on posts about the election poll) to cite but two examples.

But essentially you're right - we examine and criticse the performance of a raft of elected offcials and senior officers, ask questions which we feel need answers, investigate whenever our limited resources allow, and generally endeavour to keep them accountable. In fact, much like an Opposition in any democracy, mixed with the fourth estate.

So those activities are intrinsically wrong, or worthless, in your view? Then we can suggest a few places where you'd probably be happier. North Korea, the Congo, parts of Eastern Europe... over there no one criticises the Supreme Ruler (or whatever he styles himself) on pain of execution.

But till your hero manages to impose martial law and get himself appointed Emperor for Life, we'll stick to our present course, thanks.

Anonymous said...

I'm surprised there hasn't been any news anywhere about the Youth Council. Weren't they due for a public meeting today? Odd that nothing has been reported here or on Morgs site although that doesn't look like its been updated in a while at all. Were the watchers watching?

Anonymous said...

If youre a WDC employee, Anon 8.07pm then youre blind or downtown for coffee with other employees. Higgie is often at council, as are the others. P-BH not so often, as she is new, and Dahya and Stevens seldom. Westwood, like Higgie, is there often. ML doesn't always use his carpark, he also runs or bikes. I believe ratepayers/voters are at last seeing the real picture and its a good one :)

Anonymous said...

Since the election I, as a WDC, employee, have never clapped eyes on her.

**************************
This posting is not from a WDC employee but from a troll. The hardest workers at council - and I AM a WDC employee - are Sue Pep who has worked days & nights on setting up the Youth Council (including the whole past weekend at a youth retreat). Also the mayor's carpark is deserted i've noted and then I saw arrive on his bike!! I can't think of one thing Sue Westwood has done - can anyone?

Anonymous said...

I'm surprised there hasn't been any news anywhere about the Youth Council ... Were the watchers watching?

1:57 AM, March 28, 2006

+++++++++++++++++++++++++++++

In a word ... NO. Too positive.

Anonymous said...

LawsWatch said:

"Way to answer to constituents Nickie, but pretty much the lickspittle, craven performance we'd warned the Watcher they were likely to get. Then again, perhaps we're being harsh - there were some awfully big words in that email"

Is there any excuse for this nastiness & personal ad hominen attack??

Anonymous said...

Isn't the true test of a mayor what they achieve? and not how many times they have a cup of tea with council officers? Just a thought.

Anonymous said...

In answer to the last poster, the youth committee was featured in the Chronicle this morning and I was interested in the comments of Michael Laws that they have more power than any other in NZ. Also that they're paid $20 a meeting.

Anonymous said...

The first job of the CEO - if indeed he does take up the cudgels on behalf of the ratepayers - must be to tell Mickey and Johnnie they can't have their water slide (and brave the inevitable tears and tantrums).

But he may be too busy writing the pink slips for staff in order to save the quarter million bucks Mickey needs to just cover one year of the cost blowout @ $1460 a day.

So when the Guyton St chainsaw massacre going to happen?

Anonymous said...

Move over the SOs, move over the Code complainants ... the mayor has a new target if the council website is right & its Horizons and their rates increases. That can't be right can it - a 25% rates increase? I might have to start agreeing with him and if you add the gangs that will be two things this year already. Shoot me Matt - put me out of my misery.

Laws Watch said...

Is there any excuse for this nastiness & personal ad hominen attack??

Is there any excuse for an elected representative placing herself so far above those who put her there that she won't even read a perfectly polite email let alone respond to it? (we only forwarded it, remember, we didn't write it).

To give the Diva his due, he'll at least engage with his critics, even though it's rarely in a constructive manner.

Other people, while often harshly disagreeing with us, have responded - and to emails written by Watchers, not members of the public.

It's time Ms "Let them eat cake" Higgie and her ilk got their noses out of the trough and let people get elected who are truly willing to be held accountable.

If she continues to utterly ignore people - we don't expect her to agree with everyone, but she's elected to represent everyone in Wanganui, not just those who agree with her - then we'll continue to campaign to be rid of her.

Laws Watch said...

I'm surprised there hasn't been any news anywhere about the Youth Council ... Were the watchers watching?

1:57 AM, March 28, 2006

+++++++++++++++++++++++++++++

In a word ... NO. Too positive.

9:48 AM, March 28, 2006


We can't be everywhere, anon. We've repeatedly said we support the Youth Council. We even placed a link to the part of the Council website where people could nominate.

We've given Morgs plenty of space to explain and promote his youth group, and we'd be more than happy to consider for publication anything the Youth Council wished to submit to us (though we imagine they have plenty of other outlets, funded by Council).

So please, at least try a little research before sounding off. Reading previous posts is a good way to come up to speed and not make statements that leave you looking prfoundly stupid.

Anonymous said...

Horizons and their rates increases.

Indeed. I saw a BBC World piece on this recently - not Horizons rates but the general upward trend in local authority taxes. As the baby boomers toddle off to retirement homes we're going to see more and more of this - us poor sods are going to have to work 'til we're 70. I don't know what Mickey's complaining about - he retires in 10 years or something.

Anonymous said...

So, Mickey reveals a little more of his personal agenda - a local authority three times bigger than this one; wonder who his candidate for leader is?

You just want that $10,000,000 that Rangitikei have in the bank, don't you, Michael?

Anonymous said...

We've given Morgs plenty of space to explain and promote his youth group ...
------------
Looks like you are flogging a dead horse, Laws watch. As the Chron so astutely revealed this morning, "Youht of Wanganui raise their voice" but there's no Morgs there in the predictable chorus of:

"We want more stuff to do" blah blah blah. Perhaps they should read Nigelhugh's letter also in today's rag. Among his endless list of super stuff to do however, he doesn't mention Vision meetings, coffee with the mayor, collecting his pay check from Winc etc etc. But if this crop of Morgs-free youht play their cards right, they could end up with their snouts in Mickey's new-old boys trough. No wonder Morg has got HIS snout out of joint.

Anonymous said...

Geoff Robinson (Morning Report) just asked (re the Horizons rates circus) why is Michael Laws upset? Could it be, as my Wellington ad agency friend believes, that he’s really upset about his lousy radio ratings and is trying to maintain a state of relentless upsettedness till the survey period ends this Friday?

No doubt he was thinking of Ms Lush when he said Horizons councillors didn’t have “the intellectual or financial ability to serve in the positions to which they were elected”. Apparently she raised not a whimper in protest about the numbers, on the occasions she bothered to turn up for budget meetings at Horizons.

But then that’s also par for the course for vision’s intellectual giants like Dotty, Nicky, Marty et al.

So all the local govt loonies are at Horizons, Mickey? Yeah right.

Anonymous said...

Yeah I notice Morgs not part of the new youth council. They interviewed lots of youth. Did he not apply or not measure up?

Anonymous said...

Interesting that Horizons councillor Brookhammer's media release in todays Chron came from the desk of a WDC staff member, isnt it nice that Wanganui ratepayers are subsidising her role at Horizons,or maybe she didnt even write it herself?

Anonymous said...

Good one, Cr Main!
---------
Call for dumping Horizons 'a rant'
31 March 2006

The call by Wanganui Mayor Michael Laws for the city to split from Horizons is being dismissed by a regional councillor from Wanganui as one man's rant.
Mr Laws has slammed Horizons Regional Council as a "bloated Palmerston North bureaucracy", and wants Wanganui to take over the regional council's functions there. But Cr Annette Main is already bored by his comments.
"Until there's a wider call, I don't think it can be taken seriously," she said yesterday.

From the Manawatu Standard ...
more at
http://www.stuff.co.nz/stuff/manawatustandard/0,2106,3622579a6502,00.html