Meanwhile, in other news...
Cr Rangi Wills today strongly defended his decision to abstain on a crucial vote which might have preserved the last tattered vestiges of democracy in Wanganui.
"Sure I handed diVision another victory," the defiant councillor told the Chronic. "But think of the shockwaves that would have spread through Wanganui if I hadn't held fast to my unbroken record of shameless kowtowing to everything Michael wants! I wouldn't have wanted to be responsible for the heart attacks of many residents upon waking to the news I'd made an independent decision for the first time. And frankly, I'm appalled at the reckless disregard for public safety shown by my critics."
Pausing briefly to light another candle in the small shrine devoted to the Diva he maintains in his lounge, Cr Wills continued.
"Yes, I stood under a Ratepayers' Association banner in 2004. And yes, Ratepayers are explicitly opposed to a reduction in councillor numbers, citing the fact that less councillors equals less representation. But they simply don't understand," Cr Wills said. "If only they'd heard Michael explain it the way I have, in one of those private meetings where he bails me up in the stalls in the men's room. First off, what people have to realise is that we don't need as many councillors because the population is set to drastically decrease thanks to the fact that Michael has made it clear that anyone poor, unemployed, artistically inclined, pregnant (unless to him), or Maori isn't welcome here. I certainly don't know those sorts of people. And second, it's about efficiency. 'Less is more', as Michael said. Fewer people means greater efficiencies, which is why he's campaigning so strongly for less OBGYNs and less maternity facilities... oh, hang on... umm...
"Anyway," he added, quickly changing the subject, "it took me completely by surprise. Utterly. I had no prior warning at all, unless you count the detailed agenda I received days earlier, the email Michael sent last Friday and the discussion that occured prior to the decision. But they didn't contain any reminders of how Michael wanted me to vote, so when it came time to do so, I was completely at a loss. And anyway, I was distracted by the way the light reflected so beautifully off of Michael's hair."
Lighting a stick of incense and turning to bow three times before the altar, Cr Wills briefly recomposed himself. Appearing to read notes written on his shirt cuff, possibly in blood, he added emphatically "Even if I'd voted to have the issue resolved on Monday - when, purely coincidentally Micahel didn't have the numbers to get his own way - then it wouldn't have really been resolved at all."
This strained even the Chronic's incredulity (an attribute for which we're not exactly renowned) and, seeing the look on this reporter's face Cr Wills quickly explained. "Well, really, Council meetings are just window dressing. The real decisions are made behind the scenes, at those private diVision caucus meetings Michael holds. The ones I get the memos from aferwards," he added, a look of pride suffusing his normally dull appearance.
"Therefore, if something went wrong - say, Sue forgot to make the journey all the way from Wellington to raise her hand on cue - what happened at the meeting wouldn't be what had actually been agreed on. By the people who actually make the decisions. Well, by Michael actually, but I'm told Dotty and Marty and the rest get to decide whether they nod, go 'um hmm' or just beam vacantly. Dotty seems to have stuck with the latter," he surmised.
"So really, all I'd have done by voting - aside from my civic duty, of course - was to delay Michael getting his own way," Cr Wills explained, warming to the topic. "And we all know what that would have meant. I might have been called a useless... well... a... something not very nice," he concluded, blushing profusely. "And I don't want that. No siree boss".
Comments on this post are now closed.
43 comments:
This is great, LawsWatch. If we don't keep laughing we'll die of despair.
The mayor fires the first salvo on the representation issue - those cockies are getting fifty times the reps of us townies. ross Mitchell-Anyon was right: they're a protected (protective?) lot.
Anonymous said...
The mayor fires the first salvo on the representation issue
********
Mickey, pack up your tent and head for the hills, mate. You're gonna get done like a dog's dinner on this when it gets to Wellington.
Mickey spun:
those cockies are getting fifty times the reps of us townies.
Fifty times what exactly? On the basis that fifty times zero zilch etc is fifty, and assuming you're talking about the likes of the Cuba St cuncillor Pep, you may be right.
Face it Mickey those cockies have got Mickie (sorry Nickie) Higgie representing you (sorry them).
Does Antoinette Beck get to vote at the next council meeting? I don't see why being domiciled in the Big Auck and not even being a councillor should disqualify her - after all we have the lovely Sue in Wellywood and a mayor who comes and goes like the fairie queen. And on the basis of this morning's chunderosity in the Chron, Rangi Wills is definitely resident on some other planet. And then there's ... well all the rest, really, dahlings.
from Dotty's Daily Dross:
Just four of the issues I have been trying to correct include: noisy neighbours in Gonville, unkempt sections/old vehicle dumping in Marybank, the effects of flooding on the landscape at Rotokawau and building permit delays in Springvale.
---------
So poor old Dotty’s back to moaning about how busy busy busy (did she say busy?) she is trying to “correct” issues for grumpy constituents. Hang on, didn’t Mickey say people take their petty problems direct to the mayor or council reception? Given that sourpuss Dotty’s public slagging of ratepayers and others has probably the same chilling effect as her boss’s, could it just be that other “real” councillors do earn their keep after all.
But don’t whatever you do let the facts get in the way of a good bout of slagging, will you Mickey?
Dotty's Daily Dross:
old vehicle dumping in Marybank,
------------------------------
Where????
Dot is standing in for the Mayor on leave. Of course she is going to be busy. Just as well it is apparently a quiet time at council at the moment.
Wager: The mayor will get his way on the representation issue and the Commission will reduce the munber of councillors to ten.
Piss you off? Suck on that.
Has the mayor lost a council vote since being elected? Has he lost a referendum? Has he lost a by-election?
Answer: No, No and no.
Knowing Rangi, I had discounted the description of him as Vision's poodle, but now it's undeniable.
Still, a fool and his duty as an elected representative are easily parted, it seems.
A possible explanation for the growing madness of Mickey:
In view of his enthusiastic endorsement for silicone implants in the desperate and stupid Radio Dead freebie ads on Prime, is it possible he's had an implant to fill the space where the rational thinking part of his brain failed to develop? And that it's now leaking.
You're gonna get done like a dog's dinner on this when it gets to Wellington.
___________________________________
Let's hope so. Surely "Michael Laws' lies" will be all the reason the electoral commission needs to keep the status quo, but don't count on it.
Rangi Wills has betrayed his constituency.
Just like Michael Laws always does.
Perhaps Dot will tell us next week how much time she spends listening to people complaining about Mental Mickey's abusive behaviour. That probably takes a fair bit of her time ... or perhaps she just puts her hands over her ears and whistles the division theme song.
Has the mayor lost a council vote since being elected? Has he lost a referendum? Has he lost a by-election?
Answer: No, No and no.
Thanks for quickly spotting the point of this post, anon. With spineless jellyfish around the Council table, he's not likely to, either.
But then again, neither did Hitler. Fan of his too, are you?
"anon" siad:
Piss you off? Suck on that.
8:58 AM, August 18, 2006
****
Good to see Mickey raising the standard of debate here. What's the matter, Mickey? This morning's Chron a bit much for your delicate morning constitution, was it?
PS You're not the mayor, right, Mickey?
Anonymous said...
Wager: The mayor will get his way on the representation issue and the Commission will reduce the munber of councillors to ten.
Piss you off? Suck on that.
8:58 AM, August 18, 2006
Okay. How much would you like the wager to be? Shall we say $100? Or are you just another loudmouthed Mental-Mickey-ite? I've got a crisp hundred here in my hand right now....(because I have a decent job earn more than the average wage, which seems to be a precondition for humanity in Mickey-world)
Dotty may be acting Mayor but Mickey is still at "work" (in the council building) pulling the strings.
More questions:
Has the mayor lost credibility since the election? Has he lost respect? Has he lost his marbles?
Answer: Yes. Yes and Yes.
It's hard not to feel a little bit sorry for Rangi, being made to look a complete twat by Mickey just because he couldn't persuade Pep to come out of hiding in Wellington for a lousy council meeting.
Or should we feel sorry for Mickey who is obviously losing control of his once-was-Vision gal Friday?
Does the Mayor keep winning. Does Vision keep winning. Does LW fail again in its efforts to overturn the democratic will of Wangaanui people?
Yes. yes. Yes.
Losers. When will you dorks ever win anything?
It's hard not to feel a little bit sorry for Rangi, being made to look a complete twat by Mickey
---------------
I don't, he's got a spine and (I presume) balls. Just hasn't got the guts to use them. We want councillors who can think not councillors who can follow a script.
In response to the Mayor's comments regarding the Councillors who don't support his heinous little plan to reduce councillor numbers (which coincidentally he has presented no logical rationale for).
So the pro-democracy (therefore pro-Wanganui) Councillors are "selfish" are they? BS!
People in glass houses shouldn't throw stones, Mickey! It is abundantly clear that Michael Laws is at the top of the list for pathologically self obsessed (synonymous with selfish) individuals in this town.
So the logical question for Mickey is: What is in it for you?
Didn't he throw the Queen's picture out of council chambers so his picture could go in her place and those rebellious buggers voted her back in? That would be a loss.
I think the push for a smaller council could indicate he is thinking of standing again and can't find enough suckers to run with him and provide a platform he can stand on. Gotta have that majority. Besides, five sheep will be easier to manage than six. He certainly is working hard to reduce the numbers.
Word from the street is that the mayor is just too 'up himself'.
I reckon Sue P. immigrated to Wellington to get away from Laws…I would too if I was in her position.
No wanting to knock the chron in a week when they have done an exceptionally good job of making Mickey look like a dangerous anti-democratic maniac and Rangi like a complete idiot (well they didn't really need much help, did they?) ... but ..
Wouldn't it be nice if they splashed out on a toll call to Wellington and ask Cr Peperrell just why she didn't paddle her waka to Whanganui for the big vote?
Or perhaps the mayor can enlighten us, in her continued absence.
Yep, poor Rangi must have been quoted out of context when he said he was the only councillor to have researched the effect reducing councillor numbers had on democracy.
What he probably really said was that he was the only Vision councillor to have ........
I reckon Sue P. immigrated to Wellington to get away from Laws…I would too if I was in her position.
-------------------------------------------
Heres hoping that the rest of the Vision team come to their senses and get an intervention on Mickey or fake their own deaths...
GK saw the writing on the wall, he'll be counting his lucky stars he got out when he did. No one works for that long in a community and gains a reputation for being a great guy, to watch a control freak like Laws shit it up against the wall in 5 minutes.
I hope the rest of the Vision team don't plan on living here after their short-lived council careers...for their sake!
It is definite that Mickey is going to stand for Mayor again.
He is already touting for new people to stand at the next election under the division banner.
I know one person that has been approached by Mickey himself personally.
Go Don!!
Looks like mental Mickey has finally been told to keep his more rapid ravings off the Council website. So, Mickey, what did Dr W say? Come on, you can tell us.
Who will Mickey get to run the jack-up poll to show how he just HAS to stand again ("sorry Dot but the people have spoken") now that Antoinette Beck is otherwise engaged in Auckland?
Mind you, that shouldn't be any deterrent. After all, adding to the world's population and playing happy families hasn't stopped Mickey f--king with the facts, has it?
Anonymous said...
Looks like mental Mickey has finally been told to keep his more rapid ravings off the Council ...
Sorry correction -- that should be rabid, but choose your own adjectives Watchers.
Yeah right. The guy won the election, was on the right side of both referenda, and won the by-election. He'd shit in if he stood again and the old guard like Mcgregor are getting worried because they're losing their rural seats and aren't sure if the urbans will vote for them.
And which guy has been approached for vision but declined> More BS: if the poster haad any guts they'd say but no name, no truth.
Q. Why did the Pep leave town and why doesn't she come to meetings?
A. Michael Brian Laws.
Q. Why does Mickey need to reduce Council numbers?
A. There aren't enough credible people left who are also stupid enough to join Vision.
Q. What is that smell?
Anonymous said...
Yeah right. The guy won the election, was on the right side of both referenda, and won the blah blah blah blah
*******
Good to see you're out of the birthing suite and back on the bullshit trail here, Mickey. Welcome back, we think you're great entertainment. It's just a pity you're such a crap mayor, is all.
It's not surprising that Napier council wants to reduce the number of councillors ... they probably figure that will reduce the chances of ever getting Mickey back.
Russell F. ( from ratepayers) was one of the guys Laws ask personally. But Laws was turned down as the guy has moral principals.
And which guy has been approached for vision but declined> More BS: if the poster haad any guts they'd say but no name, no truth.
____________
Oh!!! come on mickey clone. I didn,t say the person had declined, nor did I say it was a guy.
I respect a person's privicy. It is up to the person mickey asked, or for mickey to release the name.
It is not Bull Shit!!!! It is the truth.
Quite frankly this sounds like you Mickey---- and you know it's true.
"Anon" @ 1:13 PM said:
And which guy has been approached for vision but declined> More BS: if the poster haad any guts they'd say but no name, no truth.
______________________________
First of all the original post never mention the gender of the potential Vision candidate. Which guy? Let that one slip, eh Mickey?
And the only bullshit here is some demented fool who thinks that the people who post here are going to give you what you want Mickey (e.g names of innocent folk who don't want any association with YOU!)
hey losers. suck on democracy and see who's keeps winning. not you wankers with shit jobs and shit IQs and shit little futures having achieved nothing in yoir miserable petty existences. go the mayor - stick it to these wankers.
and why would the mayor ask a destiny candidate - he chooses winners to stand for vision and they keep on winning.
Post a Comment