Hanging the Mayor
There's been a bit of confusion over the provenance of the Mayoral portrait Gallery now gracing Council, so we thought we'd set the record straight and at the same time look at an interesting piece of Wanganui history which resonates down the ages to the present day.
Our understanding is that none of the Mayoral portraits were hanging in the chamber, or anywhere for that matter, till the Diva had them all printed up and framed and put there early this year. This is confirmed by Council's 4 April Minutes which state that:
This year the Chamber has been enhanced with the installation of 25 portraits of former Wanganui Mayors and the Peter McIntyre painting 'Wanganui. Mayor Laws also proposes that funding be provided for the commissioning of an artwork to tell the story of Wanganui, within the Council Chamber, and that funding be provided for the commissioning of a carved Maori entranceway to the entrance of the Chamber.The addition of the sitting Mayor was a more recent event. The work apparently was done by the museum and a councillor (Watchers cannot recall which one) once asked how much it cost. The answer was that "it had been done by the museum". Said councillor then pointed out that there would be an internal cost, but the matter was never heard of again. But the same Minutes do provide some information on the cost of other alterations to the building:
- $40,300 for enlarging Committee Room 2 improving access by removing the wall between it and the adjoining office. Some additional work for sound proofing, lighting and new carpeting.
- $33,700 for further developing the Council Chamber "as a formal and official reception facility available for civic functions" and, intriguigly, to remove "raised floor and benches and the media booth to be developed as a servery". We can't wait to see Sean Hoskins in a pinny, serving the sausage rolls. At last, a worthwhile function for Chron staff attending Council meetings, since reporting what actually goes on doesn't seem to be on their agenda.
Mackay was young, having been elected to the Wanganui Borough Council aged 30, and to the Mayoralty a year later. He was also regarded as clever, having gained a BA at the age of 19 and an LLB six years later. And he had a bit of a problem with a few members of the local artistic fraternity, one of whom (a young poet by the name of D'Arcy Cresswell) he shot:
It was then that Mackay invited Cresswell to visit the Sarjeant Art Gallery privately with him on the Friday. As a founder of the gallery, Mackay had his own key, and inevitably they must have spent time at the gallery's pride and joy, its marble reproduction of the ancient Greek nude "Wrestlers". Mackay took Cresswell back to his office, and showed him his collection of (female) nude photographs.While we haven't seen the Diva waving any artillery around, there are other fascinating parallels with the present. Yes, even airborne furniture:
What exactly happened then is shrouded in Cresswell's self-serving account (signed by Mackay), but Cresswell demanded that Mackay resign as Mayor, or else be exposed as a "pervert"... At half past nine on the Saturday morning, in Mackay's office, Cresswell gave Mackay a week. Mackay pleaded for hours, threatened suicide, begged Cresswell to spare his family. Cresswell forced him to write a confession, then, after further bargaining, a letter of resignation to be held in safe keeping for a month. They turned to leave. "This is for you!" shouted Mackay, and shot Cresswell in the chest. Then he put the revolver in Cresswell's hand to give the appearance of suicide.
As he was leaving, the "dying" man rose and pointed the revolver at him. Mackay slammed a door between them. Cresswell could not open it, so he flung a chair through the window and called for help.Mackay claimed the revolver had fired accidentally when he was showing it to Cresswell, but the chair through the window meant even the local police could see through that story.
Mackay eventually pleaded guilty to attempted murder and was sentenced to 15 years hard labour. He served seven, during which he was declared bankrupt and divorced by his wife. Wanganui's Mackay Street was promptly renamed Jellicoe Street, and his name was removed from the Sarjeant Gallery's foundation stone. (It was replaced in 1985). And still the eerie coincidences continue. Mackay had a problem with the local newspaper, it seems:
[During the trial, Mackay's] lawyers said he had sought treatment from doctors and "metaphysicians" (presumably clergymen) for "homosexual monomania". As well as Cresswell's harassment, Mackay had seen his lawyer the day before the shooting about an item in a local newspaper that "threatened him with exposure".And as if that's not weird enough, what did the disgraced Mackay do when he was released? Went to England and became a journalist.
The Wrestlers are still there in the Sarjeant. The story was the basis of a book by Maurice Gee published last year, The Scornful Moon. Though it was reworked and set in Wellington many of the characters are recognisable including a woman painter based on Edith Collier, whose collection is held by the Sarjeant and who has a permanent bay there dedicated to her works. The possibility of the Collier family pulling the collection out of the Sarejant amid the Mad Mayor's ravings and threats strikes terror into the hearts of those who worry about the city's reputation as an arts centre.
So while one Mayor of Wanganui shoots someone over the works at the Sarjeant, his successor 85 years later shoots his mouth off on the same topic. Spooky, possums, as Dame Edna would say.
Comments on this post are now closed.
41 comments:
Its fantastic that the mayor has initiated and finished the council chamber project - I saw it today including Mr Mackay and now all it needs is a leaflet to explain the features. I read in the paper that there's to be a carved Maori entranceway and this can only enhance the place. Credit where credit is due.
forestry investments information wasnt known but was hidden before the 2004 election.
What a lot of crap. You were just ignoring all the external reporting on the drop in forestry values, eh? Your ignorance of forestry investment matters is not WDC's fault.
3:09 PM, November 16, 2005
********************************
As a long time council watcher, even longer than Laws Watch, I think it is important to be factual about the forestry investments.
The new mayor did us all a service by exposing early on how shonky the council accounts really were. They relied upon dividends from forestry of $7 million over the three years of 2005-8. It was one of the reasons I didn't make a submission on the 2004 Annual Plan.
So I was horrified to learn that the dividends were not going to be there, because it was uneconomic to mill the forests. When I read the Mitchell Report, I understood why and that was because the revised council forecasts which were available in March 2004 hadn't been included in the Annual Plan for 2004/5. Michael Laws discovered that and I give him credit for doing so.
Mr Dutton, whose endeavour I respect, should request under the LGOIA the forestry minutes from early 2004 and that would tell us who the guilty persons were. The Forestry Management Board was chaired by the then mayor.
There seems to be a lot of comments here lately insisting the mayor deserves "credit" for just about everything. Well, I'd like to give him the credit for making lots of comments about how much credit he deserves. Credit where credit is due, I say.
anon - "all it needs is a leaflet to explain the features"
Is there a Spin Fairy in the house?
Love this history lessen, but I'm afraid our new mayor does not learns by his mistakes.
slight sidetrack=
a friend of mine lost an older relative last week.
returning to wanganui after the funeral she finds a letter signed by the mayor commiserating with her on the death and saying she is in his thoughts
as she is no fan of ml she feels offended and also has a desire to laugh at the obvious `populist` approach.
i surmise helen looks at the death notices,has the letter written and ml signs it
comments please
Intrusive and rude, I reckon. How crass to offer condolences to someone who is obviously a stranger, in such an impersonal fashion. Like junk mail only worse.
If I get one under any circumstances ever I'll hand deliver it to Porrit St. with a dose of feeling.
That foresty summation could have added a few more things. Those who were on that forestry management board were the Mayor, the CEO, the finance manager, Cr Ray Stevens and Cr Stephen Palmer plus reps from the Sth Taranaki DC and the Ruapehu DC. Was it a political decision not to tell us how bad forestry was prior to the 2004 elections? If Chas had not been standing, it might be excused as an oversight - but he did stand. Ask the other councillors how much they knew because its clear in the Mitchell Report that Cr Sue Westwood wasn't informed.
If I get one under any circumstances ever I'll hand deliver it to Porrit St. with a dose of feeling.
8:34 PM, November 16, 2005
_____________________________
Yeah right. You're brave behind anonymity but I wonder how courageous in person. Of course if you were alive, he might sincerely offer his condolences!
A new column up at the mayor's website FYI.
Well, it's a well-known tradition among Mafia Dons to send their condolences to the families of someone who annoyed them and who they've just sent to "sleep with the fishes".
Perhaps anonymous @ 7.33 pm is worried that there's a degree prescience about these cards? Do let us know if one accidentally arrives before the demise of any outspoken critics, Watchers ;-)
Does the mayor really offer sympathies to the families of the dearly departed? My opinion of him has gone up!
Yes, its part of the spin fairies job to send out condolence letters. I know a widow who received one ( with much derision) and they had her name completely wrong. This really highlighted the insincerity of the man.
that last posting was NOT very nice
Sadly this is the sort of thing that might not be offensive if any if it was done by any other civic leader who generally had earned the respect of others.
However Laws sets out to create division and offence, but is so egotistical he seemingly is unable to comprehend the distress (or mirth) he causes.
The Diva is not the first politican we've heard of undertaking (if you'll pardon the pun) this practice by any means.
Some MPs do it - and they too invariably get names wrong etc., and end up insulting at least as many people as they impress. They don't set out to - and we're sure the Diva doesn't - but like any direct mail exercise the database in invariably imperfect.
If it's for a free set of steak knives people overlook the mis-spelling of their name, but if it's to do with their departed loved ones, they not so forgiving.
Frankly, we're surprised he doesn't know the pitfalls.
It is clear that these "condolence" letters are insincere, or ML would be writing them himself. In fact, Wanganui ratepayers are paying for this in Helen Lawrence's wages, which means we're funding Laws' continual electioneering.
I feel for Helen, sometimes. What a stink job.
I wonder how UCOL graduates feel that the mayor of Wanganui seems to think they're invisible. Yes the A&P show was good (seedy roustabouts, dodgy rides, the works), and the salsa was ok (the after party at Vega went off, I'm told), but equally excellent was the BFA show and the other exhibitions that opened last week.
This "mayor" has no interest in Wanganui - just those elements of it he feels he can use to enhance his own popularity.
Comments moderation may be the best thing that's happened to this blog - who would have thought Laws and his supporter could be so articulate?
;)
Emma's letter in the Chronicle this morning isn't right, is it? I thought that council had set aside a specific amount for the Council Chambers upgrade and your earlier piece on this LW seems to suggest as much.
I guess Matt doesn't need the LGOIA anymore on the new CEO's salary. $210K minus $175 equals $45K. Where's that saving going?
Was it a political decision not to tell us how bad forestry was prior to the 2004 elections? If Chas had not been standing, it might be excused as an oversight - but he did stand. Ask the other councillors how much they knew because its clear in the Mitchell Report that Cr Sue Westwood wasn't informed.
8:36 PM, November 16, 2005
______________________________
That is a question that is worth asling. Matt - we need your skills to get those Forestry minutes from 2004. That will prove it one way or the other.
This moderation is good. The level of abuse has dropped and the points made are more succinct.
I wonder how UCOL graduates feel that the mayor of Wanganui seems to think they're invisible.
-----------------------------
They (Ucol students) only have themselves to blame. No invites went to any councillors. Compare that lack of marketing smarts with STayz and the A & P organisers. It worries me that these new crop of students (or at least their tutors) are so badly organised.
From the 2004-5 annual plan:
"Other revenue
Other revenue is lower than anticipated due to income from forestry. The LTCCP 2003-2013 had provision
for forestry revenue of $1,700,000. This revenue is not now expected in this year due to the market
conditions that surround the forestry industry."
anon 5:38 PM, November 16, 2005 said:
"...the revised council forecasts which were available in March 2004 hadn't been included in the Annual Plan for 2004/5. Michael Laws discovered that and I give him credit for doing so."
At this level of spin, it's possible to black out from the G-forces. That sound in your ears isn't heavy traffic, anon.
;)
Seems Helen hasn't wasted any time getting Dotty's ramblings onto the council's website this week - but then the only real embarrassment there seems to be her continuing unrestrained adulation for mayormichael.
Last week's pitiful and demeaning effort stays hidden in the yellowing back issues of that weekly throwaway but the damage has been done among the councillors she dissed.
Please post Dotty's River City Press comments from last week, Watchers: make sure there's a permanent record online of our deputy mayor's folly.
aNON 5.38PM "When I read the Mitchell Report, I understood why and that was because the revised council forecasts which were available in March 2004 hadn't been included in the Annual Plan for 2004/5."
Thats the point, my friend, it's all smoke and mirrors because they were.The forecast was revised for the 04/05 Annual Plan. Page 31 " Other revenue is lower than anticipated due to income from forestry. The LTCCP 2003-2013 had provision for forestry income of $1.7m. This revenue is not now expected in this year due to the market conditions that surround the forestry industry." Laws and the $44,000 man Mr Mitchell chose not to publish the explanation given by the CEo and the Finance Manager that " forestry is a commodity and subject to market fluctuation. Log prices had dropped 33% in twelve months - but it only needed a 20% increase again for the LTCCP budget model to be achieved." We all know that that has'nt happened, but who can say it wont over the term of the LTCCP to 2013.
Like I say, mate, its all smoke and mirrors, now what do you say about the Splash Centre and Riverfront Dev costs not being included in the 05/06 Annual Plan (p19)and Laws call to borrow to pay for them when he has just finished telling us that the city has horrific debt levels.Do you think he knows something about the future for log prices ?
On the forestry estimates, it's important to remember that the WDC went & got a special dividend from Wg Gas in 2004 to cover the shortfall in their forestry dividends that year. They didn't tell Wanganui that they had advice in Mar 2004 (according to the Mitchell Report) that there would be NO dividends that year, the two after that and that the $18m of est future revenue was now worth $4m. That's a lie that they were eventually caught out on and they should swing.
Re the Ucol art events - the truth is that if they did show up the mayor and his anti-arts cabal would be about as popular as a bunch of pork chops in a synagogue.
If he got heckled at the Masters Games openings, one can only imagine what arts people and students would do to show what they think of him.
And the way he puts Dotty on the podium now at events like the tram handover suggests he knows only too well that he's better off skulking in the background than exposing himself to a bit of "direct democracy" from opinionated crowds.
If he got heckled at the Masters Games openings, one can only imagine what arts people and students would do to show what they think of him.
*****************************
I was at the Masters Games and he got a great reception for his speech. Obviously the above poster wasn't.
This is a great blog!
So the whole council is unpopular with the UCOL arts fraternity? I'd say its the latter who have the problem.
Like I say, mate, its all smoke and mirrors, now what do you say about the Splash Centre and Riverfront Dev costs not being included in the 05/06 Annual Plan (p19)and Laws call to borrow to pay for them when he has just finished telling us that the city has horrific debt levels.Do you think he knows something about the future for log prices ?
8:55 AM, November 17, 2005
__________________________________
But it was made clear that the Capital projects from the referendum (eg Splash) would be funded by sale of assets. Seems fair unlike the LTCCP debt levels being linked to forestry returning $18m plus of dividends. That is importasnt because a council sets its spending priorities on the info available & the last council didn't all have the latest info on forestry which was, and still is, worthless.
What a lot of crap. You were just ignoring all the external reporting on the drop in forestry values, eh? Your ignorance of forestry investment matters is not WDC's fault.
3:09 PM, November 16, 2005
Thought you were going to moderate this sort of stuff. This poster above is a bully.
The reception he got from the Lions would have reinforced that lesson pretty well: he couldn't get away fast enough.
Anon (spinning wildly) said:
"That's a lie that they were eventually caught out on and they should swing."
There was no lie. It was published in the annual plan as reported twice (!) above. We can read, you know.
In Laws' referendum the increased running costs for the Sarjeant were published but the extra $800k odd for increase in Splash Centre costs (the true figure could be much more) wasn't. That is a lie that they were eventually caught out on and they should swing. Unlike Chas' council, who told us about the decrease in forestry receipts.
I think its nice that the mayor offers his condolences.
The queen offers her congratulations when someone turns 100.
And as for getting condolences from complete strangers, well for anyone who has lost someone ever, that generally seems to be the time when every stranger ofers you condolences.
I think there are far worse things that the LW team can pick on than that.
The mayor has made other mistakes worthwhile of watchers comments, but i think picking on what may be seen by some as a nice gesture is not right.
A death in the family is a hard time, don't make it the topic of mockery.
I seem to recall someone who sounded a lot like the mayor trying to convince us on Laws Watch that only leftie loonies with hidden agendas come out in the Chron's First Person feature to say that the one thing about Wangas that they'd change would be the mayor.
Can that commenter please tell us what hidden agenda today's First Person has -- or can it be that he's just a 62-year Wanganui citizen who thinks his town deserves better.
Helen Lawrence doesn't have anything at all to do with any of the Mayor's letters. He has a PA to do that.
Thought you were going to moderate this sort of stuff. This poster above is a bully.
We are moderating, anon. We've deleted one comment since moderation began, which followed the usual pattern:
- jump to a conclusion about who said something (in this case another comment).
- name that person (probably incorrectly).
- abuse them whilst making a point.
If one of the anonymii calls another anonymous person ignorant, we accept that the latter anonymous may feel hurt, but at least their identity isn't known to the rest of us.
Therefore we're letting robust debate continue, but watching closely. "Ignorant", for instance, implies a lack of knowledge of the facts. Rough, but relevant. "Ugly", "stupid" and the other pejoratives which used to be aimed at named persons will no longer be tolerated.
As I understand it, Helen Lawrence is employed to make our elected representatives look good to us, the electors, and no doubt to themselves. Can someone explain to me why that is of the slightest value to ratepayers or the region.
Post a Comment