Thursday, October 06, 2005

It's not Hallmark, but it's a card

A timely opportunity for those who've expressed concern about the fate of the Film Festival and other community initiatives to actually do something about it:

Have your say - Community Contracts process

The Council is proposing to change the way it allocates Community Contracts - its funding to community groups and organisations.

You are invited to make a submission on the proposals. The closing date for submissions is Monday, 31 October 2005.

Please address your submission to:
Keith Smith
Wanganui District
Council

PO Box 637
Wanganui

Key proposals include:
  • A maximum of $350,000 for Community Contracts to be budgeted by the Council each year for the next three years.Wherever possible, a three-year contract will be granted to community groups to provide certainty in their planning.
  • Wanganui Inc will be allocated $200,000 to distribute to assist events and economic development in the Wanganui District; to promote Wanganui on a national stage; and/or to provide an opportunity for people to come to Wanganui.
  • $100,000 will be allocated by the Council for social, community, recreational, cultural and environmental initiatives, with minimum contract level of $5000. The intention is to allow a limited number of recipients greater ability to achieve their goals effectively. Applicants will need to demonstrate that they have applied to other appropriate funding agencies before applying for a Community Contract.
  • Community House will be allocated $50,000 per year for three years to distribute to community groups and organisations for amounts under $5000.
A paper outlining the Community Contracts review and proposed changes is available from the Council's Customer Services Desk and the District Library. It is available on this page, where you can also make an online submission.We encourage you to consider the proposals and make a submission.
A submission needn't be formal, or lengthy, or time consuming to prepare. If you're a member of a community group, or merely concerned to see they're properly funded for the next three years, this is probably the only opportunity you'll get to influence the process.

We'd even go so far as to suggest that you call up the community organistion(s) with whom you're associated, make sure they are preparing a submission, ascertain what they'll be saying, and then write one of your own in support.

We can't blame Council for not listening if, when they ask our opinion, they're met with a deafening silence.

If any community organisation would like to make their submission public and don't have the facility to do so, send it to lawswatch-at-hotmail-dot-com and we'll arrange for it to be linked from here. Alternatively, if you've posted it to your own website, send us the link.

Meanwhile, Murray Hughes confesses he's having trouble coming to terms with this whole "democracy" thingo.

Having operated my own business for many years, one has had a steep learning curve and had to virtually learn or accept new words like Consultation, Process, LTCCP and so on. Much of local government is about consultation which is laid down in the Local Government Act. Councillors are criticised for making decisions without adequate consultation and also criticised for consulting through mediums such as referenda. Talk about a no-win situation.
Not quite the way it was portrayed when you signed on, and were no doubt told that "crash through or crash" approach would work better than it has been, huh? But then again, it didn't do wonders for the guy who coined the phrase, either. And if you didn't know words like "consultation" or "process" when running a business, we're willing to bet there's a few people thanking their lucky stars they're working for someone other than you.

Much time has been spent during the first year putting the building blocks in place and I expect to see the fruits of this during the next 12–18 months. Splash Centre, riverfront redevelopment, the Old Town area and the Heart of Wanganui project are some.
So do we, Muzza. So do we. The Splash Centre redevelopment in 12-18 months, along with the mysteriously off-the-radar Heart of Wanganui Project in the same timeframe. Yes, that would be nice. There's just the small matter of a few million dollars between us and absolute nirvana, in fact.

One of the pledges Vision candidates gave was to introduce a ratepayers/residents concession card. I am now working on such a card and hope to be able to present something to Council in the New Year. The card should provide discounts on a range of Council owned or controlled organisations, together with those in private enterprise who wish to be involved. This could include restaurants, hairdressers, florists, chemists, real estate agents, hotels/motels to name a few.
Concessions off, say, entry to the Splash Centre? Which Council officers are telling you will already need patronage to increase by 50 percent just to have any hope of breaking even. But that's 50 percent at current entry prices. Or the Sarjeant Gallery perhaps. Oops, no, wait on, that needs money spent on it as well. Perhaps they'll be allowed in on quiet days to see where their $100,000 was spent refurbishing Guyton Street.

We won't leave you hanging, Muzza. Here's our design for Wanganui's ideal concession card. Readers may like to suggest additional concessions which could be provided to happy citizens at a cut price without threatening our next "nil rates increase".

Comments on this post are now closed.

43 comments:

Anonymous said...

Thanks LawsWatch. Anyone who has been wondering what has been going on in Mr Hughes' mind the last 12 months now knows. It's not a pretty picture.

Anonymous said...

"Councillors are criticised for making decisions without adequate consultation and also criticised for consulting through mediums such as referenda. Talk about a no-win situation."

That's because referenda don't qualify as "adequate consultation", Murray, so your second criticism is in fact the same as your first. Well done Mr. logic. Ever heard of the "Community Outcomes" consultation process?

Anonymous said...

Poor Michael Laws. you just can't face the fact there are more of us in there, enjoying a bit of fun at your expense.

Anonymous said...

I'm not Carol either, but one thing is clear: Lawsmob accuses people here of being obsessed with, and hating, Michael Laws.

What's really going on has nothing to do with hatred, except that displayed in comments supporting Laws.

So if it's not hatred, what is it? It's a demand. A demand for honesty and accountability in elected servants. As long as Laws lacks the former and ducks the latter he will meet this resistance to his office.

Anonymous said...

Yeah you are OBSESSED with Michael - I think he'd be flattered.

Anonymous said...

The mayor hasn't lied about ANYTHING since elected. So its irrational hatred that keeps this blog (& Carol) going.

Anonymous said...

No , I'm interested in how this city is being run, that's all. However, because Laws is a control freak it's hard to get off the subject of the Diva and he's good sport!

Anonymous said...

"reducing the number of Councillors will save money>"

"The promoters exaggerated the costs"

"Everything I do is good for Wanganui"

"I don't think in terms of Vision and non-Vision on this Council"

Anonymous said...

Michael, Michael, Michael - your record is broken.

Please change it before you next appear back here to slag off whichever individual happens to be the prime object of your hatred for the day.

Anonymous said...

Doesn't Bill Manhire teach his students that repetition is the enemy of good prose.

Anonymous said...

I'm not the mayor you dickheads.
I just like insulting you \negative wankers because its the only language u understand.

Anonymous said...

er, right...

I don't care who you are. You contribute nothing to this debate, and that presumably is because you've nothing of value to say.

Back on topic. These changes to the Community Contracts process. Does anyone else do it this way? If so, does it work?

Anonymous said...

I seem to recall Keith Smith saying the process, which was developed more than ten years ago, has been a model for other councils around the country.

Anonymous said...

Only another $40k or so to go before the waterfront upgrade can start looking for builders. And then another $100k to find by the time they get 'round to doing it. The mayor of New Plymouth recently commented how easy it is to attract skilled workers, and what a big drawcard the improvements to the Govett Brewster and the Len Lye installations are.

D'oh!

Anonymous said...

...which was developed more than ten years ago...

So it's probably due for an overhaul. Dr. Warburton should have a major input, except that he barely knows the ropes. "New words like Consultation, Process, LTCCP and so on."

So Colin's dreaming of retirement, Dave's on a steep learning curve, and Vision have come up with a few ideas.

Danger Will Robinson danger.

Anonymous said...

Who is likely to loose out with this new way of dishing out the cash?

Anonymous said...

City Mission, I believe has been told not to reapply.

Anonymous said...

Thanks Laws Watch ... The Kevin - David bit is fantastic, haven't laughed so much in ages!

Anonymous said...

i wonder about local theatres!!!there is so little allotted to the creative sector-and if the city mission is having trouble-----

Anonymous said...

The new criteria goes like this: if you're Mickey Mayor's favourite today, he'll forget he said anything by tomorrow, then force you to re-apply by which time the look on your face will have convinced him that you're one of those nutters, so you'll get nothing.

Anonymous said...

Stop moaning we'll have the mayoral mile ..... 5 thousand spent of ratepayers money this year, but next? The sky's the limit!

Anonymous said...

You can see where the $393K approx went this year here:
http://www.wanganui.govt.nz/news/showNews.asp?id=269

The smart money would be on the so-called economic development "stars" geting the lion's share of the money in future, especially things like film premieres, mayoral miles and other events that have the royal blessing.




And here's what the Diva had to say about the list:

Mr Laws said that the published contracts did not include the $38,000 community contract for the Cooks Gardens Trust Board nor the $20,000 for the creation and support of a Wanganui Youth Council. In essence there has been a $12,000 decrease in community contract funding

Anonymous said...

DOTTY says in the RCP: "There are a number of people who make life miserable for their neighbours by their noise, scruffy habits and downright rudeness. It is quite unfair, but without a 'Bad Neighbour' Bylaw, Council can often not do much about these problems."

Now that will have the good residents of Pickwick and beyond choking on their G&Ts.

You know, Dotty, they're still talking about the bad neighbours they ended up with about a year ago.

Anonymous said...

I hope the riverfront, as designed and suggested by Chas' council, goes ahead, too.

Anonymous said...

"You know, Dotty, they're still talking about the bad neighbours they ended up with about a year ago."

Bad neighbours??? Neighbours from hell more like. In fact, a vision of hell, they say.

Anonymous said...

This is the riverfront development developed by the Vision council, voted on by Wanganui and attracting $100K from Sue Westwood's PowerCo. Sounds like a community effort to me and not an SOS whinger in sight!

Anonymous said...

The Riverfront development was designed by the previous Council, spinner.

Anonymous said...

...and one of the founders of SOS was on that Council.

Anonymous said...

Lying Lawsmob. Taking credit for someone else's work only emphasises the fact that you've nothing to show for the year, and in three years time when Mickey's gone, you'll be nothing but a bad memory. Sob.

Anonymous said...

The last council had NO money for the riverfront development and actually had no $ to cope with the Feb 04 storm.
This council found the money for both repair and renewal & still had a nil rates increase. Suck on that Mitchell-Anyon altho' you wanted all the council dosh to go on that mausoleum out the back of the Sarjeant. A great pity Ross MA wasn't honest about the Auckland $ not being there, and the council never having the cash anyway.
Oh yeah - and watch THIS council take credit for the waterfront development. Go Vision!!

Laws Watch said...

This is the riverfront development developed by the Vision council

Ahh we're back to that favourite quote of Mickey's are we? The one that says history will be good to him, because he intends to write it. Well not on here he won't. The Riverfront development first gets a mention back in September 2002 near as we can tell. Might have been slightly earlier. But certainly pre-dating Mickey's reign by at least two years.

This Council's contribution has been to decide to fund it through asset sales.

The last council had NO money for the riverfront development... watch THIS council take credit for the waterfront development. Go Vision!!

Ah yes, the budget strategy favoured by bankrupts everywhere. Take an armload of the family silver down to the pawnbrokers and sell it off to fund your next spree. How vision-less of the last Council not to have had such foresight!

Anonymous said...

You're stupid, LawsWatch - but then we know that, don't we Carol?
Only this vision council found the money to fund both the Splash extension AND the riverfront development. The last one didn't have any $ and splurged it all on the Sarjeant extension (which even you loathe Carol, yes, deep down you do). And they had a nil rates increase too - special council, Carol. Special.

Anonymous said...

Anonymous said...
You're stupid, LawsWatch - but then we know that, don't we Carol?

9:12 PM, October 06, 2005

What planet do you come from?

Anonymous said...

When Michael Laws
Bares his claws
The town all laugh
And watchers barf
As the Diva shows his flaws

Anonymous said...

The Diva pouts
And stamps and shouts
But we Watchers know
He has to go
Like Don, he'll soon be out

Anonymous said...

The crap poet has to be anonymous because no person would put their name to such inanities. On that basis I'd count out the Rick Rudds, David Murrays and even Dull Dutton. That leaves a schoolteacher as the author because they're so bloody adolescent.

Laws Watch said...

Bravely hiding behind the cloak of anonymity whilst finger-pointing, anonymous said: Only this vision council found the money to fund both the Splash extension AND the riverfront development.

Would you care to point readers to any reference which proves that Vision actually have the money for the Splash Centre, as opposed to hoping sponsors will step in to bail them out? You're saying they've "found" the difference between the $2.5 million they've committed and eventual cost ($4 million worth was the last figure bandied round at Council)? Where?

Not to mention increased running costs, which they're going to "find" in your pocket - $57.25 from you and every other mug ratepayer. Plus increased admission fees from users.

And yes, they've said they'll fund the Riverfront project. Through selling other assets.

Advertisement

You too can "find" money!! Just sell your belongings at your nearest Cash Converters. You'll have no furniture left, but the Lawsmob will think you're awfully clever!

And if you run a public facility, just raise the price and you'll magically "find" even more money! And then, when you're still in the red, raise taxes!

Play Mickey's Monopoly Money today!

Anonymous said...

Riverbank Development, so what is planned, what happened to the plan Richard Munneke was promoting before he left for calmer shores at Horizons, they involved developing behind Vega and beyond, closing the road under the bridge etc.,we now seem to have a plan to build some sort of platform out into the river,'just like Virginia Lake'has anyone seen exactly what we are supposed to have voted for in the referendum, or are we just going to accept that our council knows best when it comes to designing our waterfront?Im worried we are going to spend a lot of money and end up with a poorly designed concept which doesnt use this valuable asset to its best advantage.

Anonymous said...

What a hypocrite you are LawsWatch.
You condemn others for being anonymous but hide yourself.
And 'Snow' & LawsWatch seem too well connected to be other than the same person.

Anonymous said...

As for 'Snow' - tough. Its gonna happen AND THERE'S NOTHING YOU CAN DO ABOUT. Go hug a painting.

Anonymous said...

Anonymous said...
This is the riverfront development developed by the Vision council, voted on by Wanganui and attracting $100K from Sue Westwood's PowerCo. Sounds like a community effort to me and not an SOS whinger in sight! 5:46 PM, October 06, 2005


Who are Powerco? Where do they get their money? Is it another name for a rates subsidy, after all its run by a councillor?

Anonymous said...

Thanks for the constructive response 'anonymous'
There's something wrong with being interested in the way development of the waterfront occurs?
Your response just adds to my concern, chainsaw sculptures in the Ave spring to mind as a good example of the way this Council lets our best assests be incrementally undermined!

Anonymous said...

Powerco Whanganui Trust is managed by a chap called Stewart Wright at markhams and is not a council funded organisation as I understand. They have also put money up for the sarjeant and the splash centre. ($500,000 if I remember from the chron correctly). Not sure who is on it as they dont seem to have public meetings. Money is all from the old Powerco, and used to be run by Gerald McDouall.